How "Scream 7" handles Melissa Barrera and Jenna Ortega&x27;s franchise exits Nick RomanoFri, February 27, 2026 at 5:00 PM UTC 0 Jenna Ortega and Melissa Barrera in 'Scream VI'Credit: Philippe Bosse / Paramount Pictures / Courtesy Everett Collection This article contains spoilers from Scream 7. If you're reading this article about specific plot points of the new Scream movie, then you have at least a general awareness of the franchise, including how the seventh entry was once upon a time going to be a very different movie.

How "Scream 7" handles Melissa Barrera and Jenna Ortega's franchise exits

Nick RomanoFri, February 27, 2026 at 5:00 PM UTC

0

Jenna Ortega and Melissa Barrera in 'Scream VI'Credit: Philippe Bosse / Paramount Pictures / Courtesy Everett Collection

This article contains spoilers from Scream 7.

If you're reading this article about specific plot points of the new Scream movie, then you have at least a general awareness of the franchise, including how the seventh entry was once upon a time going to be a very different movie.

The original plan for Scream 7 involved director Christopher Landon taking the reins from the Radio Silence filmmaking collective after 2022's Scream (5) and 2023's Scream VI. Melissa Barrera and Jenna Ortega, established as the two primary stars of a new era for the meta slasher franchise, then both left in rapid succession; the former was fired over expressing her views about the Israel-Hamas war on social media, the latter self-ejected because "it was all kind of falling apart." Landon himself followed suit.

The Scream 7 that's now playing in theaters is a wholly new take without the presence of Barrera and Ortega's Carpenter sisters. Original Scream scribe Kevin Williamson crafted a story around Neve Campbell's Sidney Evans (formerly Prescott) and her family, teenage daughter Tatum (Isabel May), and cop husband Mark (Joel McHale), in their new home of Pine Grove. And yet, because this franchise is still very self-aware, it does somewhat deal with the events of the past two movies — or at least comments on them.

In what could be interpreted as a salting-the-earth approach, Scream 7 does not mention the characters of Sam (Barrera) and Tara (Ortega) by name at all. The closest we get is a quip from Jasmin Savoy Brown's Mindy Meeks-Martin. Along with Mason Gooding's Chad, the Meeks-Martin twins are the only new characters from the Barrera era of Scream that return for this sequel.

Ghostface in 'Scream 7'Credit: Jessica Miglio/Paramount

During a bar scene in which the teens theorize who the new Ghostface killer or killers could be, Mindy remarks, "Billy Loomis had a secret love child, so who the f--- knows?" as a nod to Sam, the daughter of the now-deceased Ghostface of the first movie, played by Skeet Ulrich.

There are numerous other mentions to what happened in New York City and the events of Scream VI, like when Asa Germann's Lucas, the son of Anna Camp's Jessica and next-door neighbor to Sidney in Pine Grove, mentions watching both the old Dateline coverage and the Netflix documentary on the NYC attack. Courteney Cox's Gale Weathers, now a reporter for NY's Channel 7, also suffers from nerve damage in her hand caused by the Ghostface attack in her Manhattan apartment in the previous film.

But for the most part, Scream 7's meta commentary seems to poke fun at Scream VI a bit. Gale, in a particularly pointed quip, comments to Sid of past events, "You're lucky you sat this one out. It was brutal." One of the other two Ghostfaces, Jessica, then shouts at Sid in the ending climax, "A Ghostface attack doesn't count if you're not there."

Advertisement

However, there's the added layer of Campbell sitting out Scream VI because of a pay dispute, when considering the commentary. The actress recently told CBS Mornings of that period in her career, "When I made that decision, I just didn't think I could live with myself walking on set. It just didn't feel right. I just knew that my value to this franchise was bigger than what had been offered."

And yet, both Mindy and Chad are back for Scream 7, so there are some nods to those previous movies. Together with Sam and Tara, the characters make up the "Core Four," the leads of what was supposed to be a trilogy led by Barrera's Sam. At one point, Isabel May's Tatum exclaims to the Meeks-Martins, "Why are you here?" Good question. The twins now work for Gale as part of her camera crew, though Mindy says she has aspirations to surpass her mentor as a newswoman. Chad also acknowledges that they serve as representations of the "Woodsboro legacy."

Mason Good and Jasmin Savoy Brown in 'Scream 7'Credit: Jessica Miglio

Swaths of the fandom still take issue with Barrera's firing. In 2023, the actress's comments on the Israel-Hamas war were seen as "antisemitic" by production company Spyglass, though she later clarified her comments and denounced antisemitism. A "Boycott Scream 7" movement emerged, fueled by a recent show of force by pro-Palestine protestors outside the Paramount Studios lot during the film's global premiere in Los Angeles.

On the flip side, there are also legions of Scream fans who are coming out to support Campbell's return as a lead of the franchise, Williamson's chance to take the director's seat for one of these films, and overall excitement for a new slasher-whodunnit.

Get your daily dose of entertainment news, celebrity updates, and what to watch with our EW Dispatch newsletter.

In an interview with Entertainment Weekly, Gooding spoke about "taking my time to grieve" the work of Scream and Scream VI while "trying to find a way to relate to the work that had been done."

"The creatives behind it, in this case Kevin and Neve," he said, "finding a way to create their collaborative effort after taking so long away from it, getting their recompense, and having the return of their influence on the franchise, hopefully, is just done in a way that you can support that and be respectful to that."

"Melissa, Jenna, Mason, and I all remain close," Brown told press on the red carpet for the Scream 7 premiere. "We're really good friends. We love each other, we support each other's work. Of course, we miss them because we came up in this franchise together, and I'm just so grateful to be back because Mindy means a lot to me. To play a queer, Black character in a franchise like this, visibility matters, and I'm really proud to play Mindy."

on Entertainment Weekly

Original Article on Source

Source: "AOL Entertainment"

Read More


Source: Entertainment

Published: February 27, 2026 at 12:46PM on Source: PRIME TIME

#ShowBiz#Sports#Celebrities#Lifestyle

How “Scream 7” handles Melissa Barrera and Jenna Ortega's franchise exits

How "Scream 7" handles Melissa Barrera and Jenna Ortega&x27;s franchise exits Nick RomanoFri, February 27,...
New Photo - Married to Medicine's Dr. Mimi Sanders Calls Out Castmate: 'Doesn't Listen' — Exclusive

Married to Medicine's Dr. Mimi Sanders Calls Out Castmate: 'Doesn't Listen' — ExclusiveRichard HolmanFri, February 27, 2026 at 5:01 PM UTC 0 Photo Credit: Phylicia J. L. Munn/Bravo When a psychiatrist joins a friend group known for raised voices, decadelong grudges, and dinners that explode before appetizers even hit the table, you might assume she'd stay neutral. Smile. Nod. Observe quietly. Not Dr. Mimi Sanders. One of the newest faces on Married to Medicine didn't come to play referee — but she's also not pretending she doesn't see what's happening right in front of her.

Married to Medicine's Dr. Mimi Sanders Calls Out Castmate: 'Doesn't Listen' — ExclusiveRichard HolmanFri, February 27, 2026 at 5:01 PM UTC

0

Photo Credit: Phylicia J. L. Munn/Bravo

When a psychiatrist joins a friend group known for raised voices, decade-long grudges, and dinners that explode before appetizers even hit the table, you might assume she'd stay neutral. Smile. Nod. Observe quietly. Not Dr. Mimi Sanders.

One of the newest faces on Married to Medicine didn't come to play referee — but she's also not pretending she doesn't see what's happening right in front of her. And as it turns out, being trained to read behavior for a living makes reality TV arguments look … very transparent. Let's just say: some of the aunties might not love having a psychiatrist in the room.

We got the chance to catch up with Dr. Mimi to talk all about group dynamics, who's not listening when others speak, and more.

Dr. Mimi says "accountability hates to see a psychiatrist coming"

Photo Credit: Paras Griffin/Bravo

Mimi laughed when I asked how her career changes the way she handles conflict. Then she dropped the most accurate line of the season.

"So a psychiatrist, I say accountability hates to see a psychiatrist coming," she said. "Because I think innately, if I see that you're not holding your own stuff, that I'm going to call it out. And I don't care who it is."

Not exactly the energy you want around when you're trying to dodge responsibility. But before anyone starts accusing her of diagnosing castmates mid-cocktail, Mimi shut that down fast.

"Some of the ladies believe I'm psychoanalyzing," she joked. "No, that costs money. And I'm not sending out invoices, okay? I'm just showing up as a friend."

Translation: therapy isn't free — but common sense is. Fair enough.

Toya Bush-Harris is the "hardest to mediate" on Married to Medicine

Throughout the season, viewers watched Mimi naturally drift into mediator mode. Not because she wanted to — but because nobody else was slowing down enough to actually listen.

"I think a good friend, that's what they do," she explained. "If you have two good friends that are not seeing eye to eye … a good friend is like, 'What can I do to help?'"

Still, she had to remind herself not to overstep.

"There are moments where I'm like, hey, I know how to resolve this conflict," she said. "But I need to step back and say, you guys are big girls. You can do it yourself."

When asked point-blank who tests her patience the most during disagreements, Mimi didn't hesitate.

Advertisement

"The hardest to mediate was Toya [Bush-Harris]," she said. "She doesn't listen to anybody. She's just here to just talk and over talk."

If you've ever tried to resolve something with someone who won't stop talking long enough to hear the other side, you already know the struggle.

It's less "conflict resolution" and more "verbal dodgeball."

Toya's not the only challenge for the Married to Medicine ladies

Photo Credit: Michael Serine/Bravo

At one point, Mimi found herself literally sandwiched between Quad Webb and Dr. Simone Whitmore during an argument — which sounds like an Olympic sport no one signed up for.

"Quad, she's going to give you a story. And she's going to go on and on," Mimi said. "And Simone is very loud."

So imagine this: One person delivering a five-minute monologue. The other raising her voice to compete. Both talking at the same time.

"We're trying to mediate the long story, a loud story, over talking. And it's a lot going on," she said.

A lot is putting it gently. Still, Mimi insists she kept her cool.

"I think I handled it with class. I handled it the best I could."

Which, frankly, deserves a medal.

New episodes of Married to Medicine stream on Hayu in Canada, the UK, and Ireland, where viewers can also catch up on past seasons and full episodes on demand.

TELL US – ARE YOU ENJOYING MARRIED TO MEDICINE THIS SEASON? HOW DO YOU THINK DR. MIMI HANDLES HER CASTMATES?

The post Married to Medicine's Dr. Mimi Sanders Calls Out Castmate: 'Doesn't Listen' — Exclusive appeared first on Reality Tea.

Original Article on Source

Source: "AOL Entertainment"

Read More


Source: Entertainment

Published: February 27, 2026 at 12:46PM on Source: PRIME TIME

#ShowBiz#Sports#Celebrities#Lifestyle

Married to Medicine’s Dr. Mimi Sanders Calls Out Castmate: ‘Doesn’t Listen’ — Exclusive

Married to Medicine's Dr. Mimi Sanders Calls Out Castmate: 'Doesn't Listen' — ExclusiveRichard HolmanFri,...
New Photo - Want more of 'The Traitors'? Here's what we know about Season 5.

Want more of &x27;The Traitors&x27;? Here&x27;s what we know about Season 5. Melina Khan, USA TODAYFri, February 27, 2026 at 5:26 PM UTC 0 Editor's note: The following contains spoilers for "The Traitors" Season 4 finale. "The Traitors" Season 4 may be in the books, but there's more treacherous gameplay on the way. The reality competition show, which airs on Peacock, has already been renewed for a fifth season. It follows a group of contestants who are secretly split into two groups: Traitors and Faithful.

Want more of 'The Traitors'? Here's what we know about Season 5.

Melina Khan, USA TODAYFri, February 27, 2026 at 5:26 PM UTC

0

Editor's note: The following contains spoilers for "The Traitors" Season 4 finale.

"The Traitors" Season 4 may be in the books, but there's more treacherous gameplay on the way.

The reality competition show, which airs on Peacock, has already been renewed for a fifth season.

It follows a group of contestants who are secretly split into two groups: Traitors and Faithful. The Faithful must determine who the Traitors are and banish them from the game to win the grand prize.

If the Faithful don't sniff out the Traitors, the latter can take all the money for themselves at the end of the show − a situation Maura Higgins found herself in during the Season 4 finale.

1 / 0You can stay in these 5 Scottish castles to live your 'Traitors' dream

'The Traitors' is back, with its scenic rolling hills of Scotland, historic castles and a bit of drama. The latest season premiere has sparked an interest in fans, with a 15% increase in vacation rentals in Scotland, according to Vrbo. Here are some of the most majestic castles to rent on your next trip.

After the remaining contestants voted out Johnny Weir, Tara Lipinski and Eric Nam, Higgins was blindsided to discover her close ally, Rob Rausch, was deceiving her all along. As the sole Traitor left standing, Rausch walked away with the entire prize pot of more than $200,000.

Here's what to know about the next season of "The Traitors."

Advertisement

Has 'The Traitors' been renewed for Season 5?

Maura Higgins and Eric Nam on "The Traitors" Season 4.

Peacock announced in August 2024 that "The Traitors" had been renewed for both Seasons 4 and 5, so more episodes are on the way.

While a release date for Season 5 hasn't yet been announced, it could fall in early January, if past seasons are any indication:

Season 1 premiered on Jan. 12, 2023

Season 2 premiered on Jan. 12, 2024

Season 3 premiered on Jan. 9, 2025

Season 4 premiered on Jan. 8, 2026

Cast members from past seasons have said filming for the show has taken place in the late spring or early summer, so it's possible that filming for the new season won't happen for a few more months.

What we know about 'The Traitors' Season 5 cast

From "Big Brother" gamers to "Real Housewives" stars, "The Traitors" features a cast of reality TV legends and other big-name public figures.

While the first season of the American version featured both reality TV stars and regular people, the previous three seasons have included only groups of public figures. Peacock also previously announced that a new civilian-led version of "The Traitors" is in the works.

As for when the cast list for the next season will be revealed, in past years, the stars have been announced in June.

Melina Khan is a national trending reporter for USA TODAY. She can be reached at melina.khan@usatoday.com.

This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Will there a Season 5 of 'The Traitors'? Here's what we know.

Original Article on Source

Source: "AOL Entertainment"

Read More


Source: Entertainment

Published: February 27, 2026 at 12:46PM on Source: PRIME TIME

#ShowBiz#Sports#Celebrities#Lifestyle

Want more of 'The Traitors'? Here's what we know about Season 5.

Want more of &x27;The Traitors&x27;? Here&x27;s what we know about Season 5. Melina Khan, USA TODAYFri, Febr...
New Photo - Ariana Grande Won't Be Attending This Sunday's Actor Awards Despite Nomination: Here's Why

Ariana Grande Won&x27;t Be Attending This Sunday&x27;s Actor Awards Despite Nomination: Here&x27;s Why Benjamin VanHooseFri, February 27, 2026 at 5:03 PM UTC 0 Ariana Grande on March 2, 2025Credit: Arturo Holmes/WireImag Ariana Grande won't be attending this Sunday's Actor Awards in person, a source tells PEOPLE The star is nominated Outstanding Performance by a Female Actor in a Supporting Role for Wicked: For Good Grande is currently preparing for her Eternal Sunshine Tour, which kicks off in June Ariana Grande won't be attending this year's Actor Awards, despite her Wicked: For Good nominat...

Ariana Grande Won't Be Attending This Sunday's Actor Awards Despite Nomination: Here's Why

Benjamin VanHooseFri, February 27, 2026 at 5:03 PM UTC

0

Ariana Grande on March 2, 2025Credit: Arturo Holmes/WireImag -

Ariana Grande won't be attending this Sunday's Actor Awards in person, a source tells PEOPLE

The star is nominated Outstanding Performance by a Female Actor in a Supporting Role for Wicked: For Good

Grande is currently preparing for her Eternal Sunshine Tour, which kicks off in June

Ariana Grande won't be attending this year's Actor Awards, despite her Wicked: For Good nomination.

The ceremony, formerly known as the Screen Actors Guild Awards, will air live from the Shrine Auditorium & Expo Hall in Los Angeles on Netflix this Sunday, March 1, starting at 8 p.m. with host Kristen Bell.

Though Grande, 32, is nominated for Outstanding Performance by a Female Actor in a Supporting Role for Wicked: For Good, she will be missing the ceremony as she rehearses for her upcoming tour, a source confirms to PEOPLE.

Grande also earned a nomination in the same category at last year's SAG Awards for her performance as Glinda in the first Wicked film.

Ariana Grande in "Wicked: For Good"Credit: Giles Keyte/Universal Pictures

— sign up for PEOPLE's free daily newsletter to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer​​, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories.

This year, for the sequel, Grande also earned nods at the Critics Choice Awards and Golden Globe Awards but was not among nominees at the BAFTA Awards and the Oscars.

Advertisement

Her fellow nominees at this year's Actor Awards are Odessa A'zion for Marty Supreme, Amy Madigan for Weapons, Wunmi Mosaku for Sinners and Teyana Taylor for One Battle After Another.

Grande's Eternal Sunshine Tour is set to officially kick off in June. On the Good Hang with Amy Poehler podcast in November, the singer said the tour was "going to be beautiful and I'm so grateful ...I think that's why I'm doing it because I'm like, 'One last hurrah.' For now." She added that another tour "might not happen again for a long, long, long, long time."

She'll soon continue with more acting roles, on screen and on the stage. Grande is set to star in Ben Stiller's Focker In-Law comedy sequel, plus she's reuniting with Wicked costar Jonathan Bailey for a revival of the musical Sunday in the Park with George in London.

Additionally, she'll lend her voice to Wicked director Jon M. Chu's animated Dr. Seuss film Oh, the Places You'll Go! and appear in the next season of Ryan Murphy's American Horror Story.

Wicked: For Good will begin streaming on Peacock March 20.

on People

Original Article on Source

Source: "AOL Entertainment"

Read More


Source: Entertainment

Published: February 27, 2026 at 12:46PM on Source: PRIME TIME

#ShowBiz#Sports#Celebrities#Lifestyle

Ariana Grande Won't Be Attending This Sunday's Actor Awards Despite Nomination: Here's Why

Ariana Grande Won&x27;t Be Attending This Sunday&x27;s Actor Awards Despite Nomination: Here&x27;s Why Benj...
New Photo - Women at risk as Taliban curbs hit Afghan healthcare, UN expert warns

Women at risk as Taliban curbs hit Afghan healthcare, UN expert warns By Emma FargeFri, February 27, 2026 at 4:36 PM UTC 0 1 / 0Aftermath of deadly earthquake in AfghanistanWomen sit inside a tent while taking refuge with others following the deadly earthquake in Bambakot village, Dera Noor district, Nangarhar province, Afghanistan, September 6, 2025. REUTERS/Sayed Hassib By Emma Farge GENEVA, Feb 27 (Reuters) Restrictions imposed by the Taliban are jeopardising the lives of women and their children who are sometimes denied emergency treatment, a ‌U.N. human rights expert said on Friday.

Women at risk as Taliban curbs hit Afghan healthcare, UN expert warns

By Emma FargeFri, February 27, 2026 at 4:36 PM UTC

0

1 / 0Aftermath of deadly earthquake in AfghanistanWomen sit inside a tent while taking refuge with others following the deadly earthquake in Bambakot village, Dera Noor district, Nangarhar province, Afghanistan, September 6, 2025. REUTERS/Sayed Hassib

By Emma Farge

GENEVA, Feb 27 (Reuters) - Restrictions imposed by the Taliban are jeopardising the lives of women and their children who are sometimes denied emergency treatment, a ‌U.N. human rights expert said on Friday.

Regulations require sick or injured women to ‌adhere to a dress code, be accompanied by a male guardian and be treated by male medics, Special Rapporteur ​on Afghanistan Richard Bennett told a press briefing.

Bennett said women were frequently denied ambulance services without a male guardian.

In one instance described in his report submitted to the U.N. Human Rights council this week, a woman was left to give birth on her own at the hospital gate since she ‌was unaccompanied. Another woman lost ⁠her four-year-old son since she could not travel alone with him to a hospital.

"The Taliban's restrictions must be reversed, otherwise they will be killing people," ⁠Bennett told a press conference in Geneva.

"These policies are not isolated measures. They form an institutionalised system of gender discrimination that denies women and girls autonomy over their own bodies, health, and futures," ​he said.

Advertisement

FEWER ​FEMALE MEDICS UNDER TALIBAN

Bennett said he shared his ​report with the Taliban authorities and ‌requested input but did not receive a reply. The Taliban says it respects women's rights in line with its interpretation of Islamic law.

The Taliban has restricted women's movements and barred girls from education beyond primary school since coming back to power in 2021, via a series of morality laws that also limit expression and employment.

As of last year, around a quarter of Afghanistan's ‌medical workers were women. But a ban on their ​medical education has shut down the pipeline meaning that fewer ​will be available in future to ​treat female patients according to gender segregation policies, Bennett said.

"It's a completely ‌unjustifiable policy. It puts the entire health ​system in jeopardy, and unless ​reversed, it will lead to unnecessary suffering, illness and death," he said.

Suraya Dalil, a former health minister of Afghanistan, said at the same press briefing that she was particularly ​worried about growing cases of ‌deaths in childbirth.

"Unfortunately, we expect higher mortality - maternal mortality (and) infant mortality - in the coming ​years because of the fact that the health workforce are systematically restricted," she ​said.

(Reporting by Emma Farge; Editing by Andrew Heavens)

Original Article on Source

Source: "AOL Breaking"

Read More


Source: Breaking

Published: February 27, 2026 at 11:55AM on Source: PRIME TIME

#ShowBiz#Sports#Celebrities#Lifestyle

Women at risk as Taliban curbs hit Afghan healthcare, UN expert warns

Women at risk as Taliban curbs hit Afghan healthcare, UN expert warns By Emma FargeFri, February 27, 2026 at 4:36 PM UT...
New Photo - 2 Panama Canal ports have dragged Panama into a tussle between superpowers

2 Panama Canal ports have dragged Panama into a tussle between superpowers ALMA SOLĂŤS Fri, February 27, 2026 at 4:44 PM UTC 0 1 / 0Panama CanalContainers sit at the Balboa terminal, run by CK Hutchison's Panama Ports Co., after Panama's government ordered the occupation of the port following a Supreme Court ruling that the concession was unconstitutional, in Panama City, Monday, Feb. 23, 2026.

2 Panama Canal ports have dragged Panama into a tussle between superpowers

ALMA SOLĂŤS Fri, February 27, 2026 at 4:44 PM UTC

0

1 / 0Panama CanalContainers sit at the Balboa terminal, run by CK Hutchison's Panama Ports Co., after Panama's government ordered the occupation of the port following a Supreme Court ruling that the concession was unconstitutional, in Panama City, Monday, Feb. 23, 2026. (AP Photo/Matias Delacroix) ()

PANAMA CITY (AP) — Two ports run for years by a Hong Kong-based company at either end of the Panama Canal have thrust Panama into a geopolitical tug-of-war between the United States and China.

Even before taking office for his second term, U.S. President Donald Trump complained that China was running the Panama Canal. The Panamanian government, which operates the canal, strongly denied that.

In late January, Panama's Supreme Court ruled that the concession made to a local subsidiary of Hong Kong's CK Hutchison was unconstitutional. This week, the Panamanian government occupied the two ports and designated two other companies to keep them running until the concession can be rebid. And on Thursday, investigators removed boxes of documents from Panama Ports Co. offices.

China is not happy and threatened consequences for Panama. President José Raúl Mulino responded Thursday, telling China "be careful," adding: "They need us more than we need them."

Here is a look at the ports that have the attention of two of the world's superpowers:

Two key ports

Although Panama is not a big importer or exporter of goods, its canal has made the country of 4 million residents a critical international logistics hub.

Massive cargo ships arrive daily from Asia, Europe and both coasts of the United States. Little of what they carry is for Panamanians, but they unload their containers in Balboa, Cristobal and other ports for onward shipping via smaller routes to their final destinations.

The Balboa Port on the Pacific Ocean side of the canal and the Cristobal Port at the Atlantic end handle around 39% of all of Panama's container traffic. About 7,000 people work at the two ports.

The two ports have been operated by Panama Ports Company, a local subsidiary of Hong Kong's CK Hutchison, since 1997.

An audit by Panama's comptroller alleged irregularities in the extension of the concession, including massive lost revenue to Panama's government. After the country's Supreme Court ruled the concession was unconstitutional, authorities said they had a transition plan that would avoid any unnecessary interruptions to port operations.

The canal

The ports are located at the entrances of the Panama Canal, but do not fall under the autonomous Panama Canal Authority that operates the waterway.

Advertisement

Given their locations, having a Chinese company operating them has long bothered the United States. U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio made his first overseas trip as the top U.S. diplomat to Panama, relaying a clear message that it was unacceptable. He suggested that China could obstruct canal traffic if it wanted to.

Since the canal, in addition to cargo ships, also accommodates U.S. warships, the United States sees national security implications. The American-built canal was turned over to the Panamanians in 1999.

China's reaction

Panama Ports Company started arbitration proceedings against Panama after the court's decision. It said the Panamanian government had kept up a "campaign" against its concession for the past year causing serious harm to the company.

It argues that its rights as an investor have been compromised and is demanding unspecified compensation. Panama Economy Minister Felipe Chapman said the company is seeking $1.5 billion. The company's concession to operate the two ports was just renewed in 2021 for 25 years.

After the court's decision, Beijing's office overseeing Hong Kong affairs criticized the ruling, saying it showed that Panamanian authorities were bowing down to "hegemonic powers."

"Panama's authorities should recognize the situation and correct their course," it said. "If they persist in their own way and refuse to see reason, they will pay a heavy price both politically and economically!"

The government's seizure of the ports this week set off another round of objections. Mulino said it was necessary to ensure their continuing operation and to determine their real value.

"The more than 7,000 jobs continue without changes," he said.

Next steps

Mulino has said that the court's decision is final and must be respected.

The ports continue operating while the legal drama builds.

Chapman, the economy minister, said that arbitration could take years. Meanwhile, the government is preparing to begin the process for a new operator of the ports.

Original Article on Source

Source: "AOL Breaking"

Read More


Source: Breaking

Published: February 27, 2026 at 11:55AM on Source: PRIME TIME

#ShowBiz#Sports#Celebrities#Lifestyle

2 Panama Canal ports have dragged Panama into a tussle between superpowers

2 Panama Canal ports have dragged Panama into a tussle between superpowers ALMA SOLĂŤS Fri, February 27, 2026 at 4:44...
New Photo - Gun ban for marijuana users gets high court review

Gun ban for marijuana users gets high court review DEVIN DWYER and PATTY SEEFri, February 27, 2026 at 10:06 AM UTC 40 As the top county law enforcement official for more than a decade, former district attorney Rob Greene regularly prosecuted crimes involving drugs even as he often consumed cannabis on the side. The Army veteran, avid hunter, and father of 3 is one of 440,000 Pennsylvanians with a stateauthorized medical marijuana card under a program lawmakers enacted in 2016.

Gun ban for marijuana users gets high court review

DEVIN DWYER and PATTY SEEFri, February 27, 2026 at 10:06 AM UTC

40

As the top county law enforcement official for more than a decade, former district attorney Rob Greene regularly prosecuted crimes involving drugs even as he often consumed cannabis on the side.

The Army veteran, avid hunter, and father of 3 is one of 440,000 Pennsylvanians with a state-authorized medical marijuana card under a program lawmakers enacted in 2016.

Greene, who stepped down as DA earlier this year, says the cannabis he uses "once or twice every week or two" has significantly improved his quality of life but also came with what he calls an unconstitutional trade-off.

"As of right now, I have zero firearms," Greene told ABC News in an interview. "I could serve 10 years in prison for having firearms because I am, according to the feds, an illegal user of marijuana. I mean, it's (expletive)."

ABC News - PHOTO: Rob Greene, former Warren County, Pa., district attorney, advocates for a medical marijuana carve-out in the federal gun ban for drug users.

For nearly 60 years, the possession of a gun by anyone who unlawfully uses or is addicted to controlled substances – including marijuana – has been banned under federal law, even when they are not intoxicated.

Public health groups call it common sense; the Trump administration calls it a cornerstone of public safety. Greene argues it should only apply to people who are in the act of using drugs.

Next week, the Supreme Court will consider whether the gun ban for drug users is unconstitutionally broad in a high-stakes case at the center of growing debate over whether marijuana deserves a carve-out in the law.

Win McNamee/Getty Images - PHOTO: The Authority of Law statue by artist James Earle Fraser in front of the United States Supreme Court building is seen on Feb. 24, 2026, in Washington, D.C.

"Are there certain drugs that are so dangerous and addictive that it's not safe for you to have a firearm? Sure," said Greene. "Marijuana is not one of them." Although Congress has prohibited the Justice Department from cracking down on state medical marijuana programs and President Trump recently signed an executive order loosening restrictions on the drug, cannabis remains prohibited under federal law.

That means 6 million registered medical marijuana patients across 40 states must surrender their Second Amendment right to own a gun as long as they are using.

ABC News - PHOTO: The Justice Department says it prosecutes roughly 300 cases a year in which a violation of the federal gun ban for unlawful drug users is the leading charge.

"Even though in the state of Pennsylvania they made medical marijuana legal, the federal law still mandates that we cannot sell you a firearm," said Tim Parker, owner of Presque Isle Gun Shop in Erie, Penn.

Parker said he frequently turns away customers who attest on a federal gun purchase form that they have used illegal drugs or mention their medical marijuana card when seeking to purchase a weapon.

"We have a sign on the outside of the door - we do not like people that smell like marijuana coming into our shop. We will not sell you anything," he said.

ABC News - PHOTO: Tim Parker, owner of Presque Isle Gun Shop in Erie, Pa., says many prospective gun buyers who also use medical marijuana, which is legal in Pennsylvania, are unaware of the federal firearm ban.

Since 1998, the FBI says countless drug users have been turned away by gun dealers because of the federal Firearm Transaction Form 4473. In addition, more than 240,000 potential gun buyers have been flagged for drug-related convictions by the background check system, according to federal data.

"Those are the kind of people that shouldn't be carrying a gun because it's all split second things, and a gun doesn't think for itself. Guns don't kill people. People kill people," said Parker.

State and local law enforcement groups have urged the Supreme Court to uphold the law, warning of the potential dangers of combining drugs and guns.

ABC News - PHOTO: Police Chief Richard Lorah of Erie, Pa., says unlawful use of controlled substances by a person possessing a firearm is a dangerous combination.

"We don't want someone who's under the influence of alcohol or methamphetamine or cocaine or marijuana to be handling a firearm. Obviously, there's some safety issues there," said Erie Police Chief Rick Lorah.

Advertisement

Of the 700 firearms confiscated in crimes in Erie since 2023, Lorah estimated 70% were probably involved in the drug trade.

While Lorah told ABC that he does not consider medical marijuana a top threat and understands the medical benefits of the drug, he says creating an exception for cannabis in the drug ban should be up to federal lawmakers.

ABC News - PHOTO: Inside the Erie Police Department gun vault, roughly 70% of the 700 weapons confiscated in crimes since 2023 had a connection to the drug trade, according to Chief Richard Lorah.

"Certainly the Second Amendment brings about a lot of strong emotion," he said. "If we could get the federal government and the states to come to a conclusion on the issue of marijuana and guns that would probably make law enforcement's life much easier."

The Justice Department says it prosecutes roughly 300 federal cases a year in which a violation of the drug user gun ban is a leading charge.

The recent prosecution of Hunter Biden, a self-confessed recovering crack cocaine addict, is considered the most high profile example. Biden was charged with lying on the federal gun transaction form and obtaining a firearm.

ABC News - PHOTO: Guns are a big part of local culture in Warren County, Pennsylvania, in the foothills of the Allegheny Mountains.

So was Ali Hemani of Texas whose case is now before the Supreme Court. The government says he admitted to using marijuana "every other day" while keeping a Glock 9mm pistol in his home.

A federal court tossed out the indictment of Hemani saying the ban is unconstitutional as applied since he was not intoxicated with a gun.

"The truth is, there has to be a showing of some kind of actual dangerousness," argued attorney Joseph Bondy, chairman of the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Law (NORML).

"You could, for example, have a prescription to consume Oxycontin or some kind of anti-psychotic medication, right? And you would still be able to possess a firearm whereas a cannabis user could not," he said.

ABC News - PHOTO: Joseph Bondy, an attorney and chairman of the National Organization for Reform of Marijuana Laws (NORML), supports legalization of firearm use by state-authorized users of cannabis.

The lower court Hemani decision spawned a rare alliance bringing together the Trump Administration, gun safety advocates, and anti-drug groups who are now appealing to the Supreme Court to hold the line.

The administration argues that a ban on guns for people who use illegal drugs is both constitutional and rooted in the nation's history and tradition.

"Back to the days of the founding, we had laws about intoxication and severe intoxication, even surrounding things like alcohol," said Jordan Davidson, government affairs director of Smart Approaches to Marijuana.

The group has warned that marijuana use has been linked to perpetrators of some of the country's deadliest mass shootings.

ABC News - PHOTO: Jordan Davison, government affairs director for Smart Approaches to Marijuana, a nonprofit advocacy group, warns of the dangers of allowing any cannabis user to bear arms.

"It's not to say that everyone who smokes marijuana is going to have cannabis induced psychosis, or even the vast majority," said Davidson, "but we need a bright line rule here to prevent against the worst possible scenarios that could occur."

Greene agrees that certain Americans who use drugs should be disarmed, but says the dangers of marijuana are overblown.

"Cannabis has helped me in a number of ways. I mean, it helps me immensely. It's helped out a lot of other people and it has hurt me in zero ways," he said.

ABC News - PHOTO: Rob Greene is an Army veteran, avid hunter and father of 3 who regularly uses cannabis under a state-authorized medical marijuana program but is legally forbidden from owning a gun.

Oral arguments in the case U.S. v Hemani will be heard by the Supreme Court on March 2. A decision on the constitutionality of the gun ban for marijuana users is expected later this spring.

Original Article on Source

Source: "AOL Breaking"

Read More


Source: Breaking

Published: February 27, 2026 at 11:55AM on Source: PRIME TIME

#ShowBiz#Sports#Celebrities#Lifestyle

Gun ban for marijuana users gets high court review

Gun ban for marijuana users gets high court review DEVIN DWYER and PATTY SEEFri, February 27, 2026 at 10:06 AM UTC 40 As...

 

PRIME SKY © 2015 | Distributed By My Blogger Themes | Designed By Templateism.com