New Photo - Left in limbo, Afghans who served with the U.S. fear Trump could send them back to the Taliban

Left in limbo, Afghans who served with the U.S. fear Trump could send them back to the Taliban Jennifer JettSun, March 29, 2026 at 10:30 AM UTC 0 Special Immigrants from Afghanistan walk through the inprocessing building after their evacuation at Camp As Sayliyah, Qatar, in 2021. (U.S. Army/Sgt. Jimmie Baker / Reuters) (U.S. Army/Sgt. Jimmie Baker) On a former U.S. military base in Qatar, Afghans who supported the United States in its 20year war against the Taliban have been left in limbo, living in windowless shipping containers far from the new lives they were once promised in the U.S.

Left in limbo, Afghans who served with the U.S. fear Trump could send them back to the Taliban

Jennifer JettSun, March 29, 2026 at 10:30 AM UTC

0

Special Immigrants from Afghanistan walk through the in-processing building after their evacuation at Camp As Sayliyah, Qatar, in 2021. (U.S. Army/Sgt. Jimmie Baker / Reuters) (U.S. Army/Sgt. Jimmie Baker)

On a former U.S. military base in Qatar, Afghans who supported the United States in its 20-year war against the Taliban have been left in limbo, living in windowless shipping containers far from the new lives they were once promised in the U.S.

Now the Trump administration is presenting them with a stark choice: Move to an unspecified third country or return to Taliban-ruled Afghanistan, where they likely face persecution, imprisonment or death.

Camp As Sayliyah, located outside Doha, hosts more than 1,100 Afghan men, women and children, most of whom have been approved for U.S. resettlement after extensive vetting. Instead, the State Department says everyone will be removed from the camp by March 31, making it the latest casualty in the Trump administration's efforts to block virtually all paths to the U.S. for Afghan allies.

The camp is the only Afghan refugee site run directly by the U.S. government, with its residents among thousands of people stranded across Afghanistan, Pakistan and elsewhere since Trump returned to office and halted all refugee resettlement. Days before the State Department's self-imposed deadline, they have been given almost no information about what will happen to them next.

The people at Camp As Sayliyah include former members of the Afghan special forces, interpreters and others who worked with the U.S. military, and relatives of U.S. service members and veterans. Their situation has become even more urgent with the U.S.-Israeli war with Iran, as the camp is rattled by Tehran's retaliatory missile strikes on a nearby U.S. air base.

Afghanistan is also engaged in its own deadly conflict with Pakistan, with Pakistani airstrikes killing civilians in Kabul and elsewhere.

Mohammad, a U.S. Army veteran whose family has been at the camp for a year and a half, said they were offered between $1,000 and $4,500 per person to return to Afghanistan, where they spent three years in hiding after the withdrawal of U.S.-led forces in 2021.

"It doesn't matter if it's a million dollars," said Mohammad, who declined to be identified by his full name out of concern for his family's safety. "How am I going to trade my dad's life or my brother's or my sister's life for, I don't know, a billion dollars?"

A State Department spokesperson said Camp As Sayliyah is "a legacy of the Biden administration's attempt to move as many Afghans to America as possible — in many cases, without proper vetting."

Afghan Special Immigrants file into the dining facility at Camp As Sayliyah, Qatar in 2021. (Sgt. Jimmie Baker / U.S. Army via Getty Images file) (Sgt. Jimmie Baker)

While the Trump administration has no plans to send anyone back to Afghanistan, the spokesperson said, "it is not appropriate or humane to keep this group of individuals on the platform indefinitely."

Moving the camp population to a third country represents "a positive resolution that provides safety for these remaining people to start a new life outside of Afghanistan," the spokesperson said.

Mohammad, who was gravely wounded in Afghanistan as a combat interpreter for the U.S. military and enlisted in the Army after moving to Texas, said he felt "betrayed — not by my fellow battle buddies, but by the administration."

While he remains proud of his service, his parents and siblings were targeted in Afghanistan because of it, and later evacuated to Qatar by the U.S. government. He says America has a duty to protect his relatives, instead of "handing my family over to the Taliban."

'What are they going to do with us?'

Camp As Sayliyah was the "flagship relocation camp" for people fleeing Afghanistan after the U.S. withdrawal, said Shawn VanDiver, president of the San Diego-based advocacy group AfghanEvac.

It was a place where they could safely wait as final preparations were made for their U.S. resettlement, he added, and a symbol of the promise America made to Afghans who risked their lives in the conflict.

Now, it is little more than a "prison camp," said VanDiver, who has visited the site multiple times. Residents are not allowed to leave the camp, where they live in windowless shipping containers designed for temporary lodging.

While moving the Afghan refugees to third countries may address immediate safety concerns amid the Iran war, it "cannot be the final step," AfghanEvac said in a statement.

Staying long term in a third country is not a good option, VanDiver said, with no guarantee that those countries wouldn't just send people back to Afghanistan.

"It's untenable for a lot of reasons, but mostly because it's the wrong thing to do," he said.

The Trump administration has not publicly confirmed any third countries that have agreed to accept people from the camp, and denies that Afghan allies face being repatriated against their will.

"Some have gone of their own volition, but we are not forcing anybody," Assistant Secretary of State S. Paul Kapur told lawmakers at a congressional hearing last month.

He said he believed about 150 Afghans had accepted the payments, and that he did not know what had happened to them.

Passengers board a charter flight carrying Afghan nationals to Qatar from Kabul in 2021. (Aamir Qureshi / AFP via Getty Images) (Aamir Qureshi)

Those still at the camp struggle to fill their time, resting in the middle of the day to avoid the desert heat, and roaming streets that are named after U.S. states to help them learn about what was supposed to be their new home. Schooling is limited, especially for older students.

Twice in the past year, Iranian strikes have hit nearby in Qatar — once last June in retaliation for U.S. strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities, and again during the U.S.-Israeli war with Iran that began Feb. 28.

The camp offers poor protection against the strikes, said VanDiver, whose group received multiple recordings from "terrified" residents of missiles being intercepted over their heads.

The arrival of Afghan allies to the U.S. had already slowed to a crawl as the Trump administration reshaped the U.S. immigration system. But their hopes were further dashed in November when a shooting in Washington killed one National Guard member and seriously injured another.

The suspect, identified as Rahmanullah Lakanwal, 29, is an Afghan national who served alongside U.S. troops as part of an elite CIA-backed unit in Afghanistan. Lakanwal, who pleaded not guilty to nine federal charges last month, was granted asylum by the Trump administration last year after arriving in the U.S. during the Biden administration.

The Trump administration imposed harsher restrictions for Afghans after the attack, halting asylum decisions, suspending visa issuance for all Afghan nationals, and moving to detain refugees already in the country.

Afghans at Camp As Sayliyah condemned the attack, but say it was the act of one individual.

Advertisement

"We want to ask the American government not to link the crime of a single Afghan to all Afghans," said a woman surnamed Salimi, a lawyer who has been at the camp with her husband and two sons, ages 2 and 4, for more than a year.

Salimi, who asked to be identified only by her last name because of security concerns, was approved for U.S. resettlement because her legal work put her at risk of persecution by the Taliban.

She had her own legal office, mostly representing women "who were poor, who were physically abused, who were pursuing divorce."

Many of her clients' husbands were members of the Taliban, some of whom were imprisoned for physical abuse or other crimes, she said.

The night the Taliban returned to power, Salimi said, she got a call from an unknown number.

Taliban fighters in Kabul, Afghanistan, in 2021. (Marcus Yam / Los Angeles Times via Getty Images file) (Marcus Yam)

"You separated my wife from me and now she's married to another man and has another life," said the man on the other end of the line. "You have to pay the price."

Soon, Salimi heard the Taliban was looking for her. Her office was closed, as she focused on keeping a low profile and finding a way out.

Salimi was eventually able to apply for a U.S. visa, a process she said took seven or eight months, including security checks.

As she flew to Qatar in January 2025, Salimi believed her family's future in the U.S. was finally secure, but Trump's return to the White House just two weeks later upended their plans, with refugee resettlement halted and Afghan nationals later barred from entering the U.S.

"Facing an uncertain future makes our mind and spirit get worse day by day," Salimi said. "What's going to happen to our future? What are they going to do with us?"

Women in particular have suffered under the Taliban, who have barred them from school beyond the sixth grade, banned their voices and bare faces in public and suspended laws against rape and child and forced marriage.

Breaking a promise

The U.S. government's about-face on Afghan allies and their families has pained veterans such as Retired Army Lt. Col. Mariah Smith, who served three tours in Afghanistan.

Translators such as Mohammad "were absolutely vital to success," Smith said, making them "a primary target" of the Taliban and other terrorist groups.

"There was this expectation and promise, like, if you help us, this is a way for you to be able to come to America," said Smith, who is vice chair of No One Left Behind, a nonprofit based in Arlington, Virginia, that advocates for Afghan and Iraqi allies.

"That's why I think it was so heartbreaking for so many veterans when we pulled out of Afghanistan," she said, "because so many of us felt like we were complicit in breaking that promise."

The treatment of Afghan allies could make people in other conflict zones "less willing to work with us," she added.

Mohammad, who grew up in Kabul, signed up as a combat interpreter for the U.S. military in 2009. That year, he was seriously wounded in Helmand province when an improvised explosive device detonated, killing the U.S. Marine right in front of him.

After recovering, he was sent to Kabul to do non-combat translation work. But every day, he said, "the task of just going from your home to the office was just, you know, life and death."

The risk was worth it, he said, "because of the value that we saw in the international community being in Afghanistan," such as his sisters being able to go to school.

In 2014, he received a Special Immigrant Visa and moved to Texas. He enlisted in the U.S. Army almost immediately as a way to give back to the country that had changed his life.

After finishing his service in 2016, Mohammad — now a U.S. citizen — worked as a Defense Department contractor in Afghanistan, right up until the withdrawal.

"It just happened out of the blue, and it was super chaotic," said Mohammad, who was in Kabul at the time. "I barely managed to get to the airport, get on the plane, and get out."

Afghan refugees arriving at Dulles International Airport in Virginia after being evacuated from Kabul in 2021. (Anna Moneymaker / Getty Images file) (Anna Moneymaker)

With the Taliban now back in power, those with ties to the U.S. military and their relatives were targets. Mohammad's family spent the next three years in hiding, his parents moving from place to place with four daughters and two sons.

"We couldn't all be together in one place," said his father, a history teacher also named Mohammad who also declined to be fully identified for safety reasons. "The Taliban intelligence services were constantly after us."

The family was evacuated to Qatar in 2024 after the younger Mohammad learned of a program to help Afghan relatives of U.S. service members. "That was a big sigh of relief for me," he said.

When Trump returned to office, the family had been fully processed and was just waiting for their U.S. visas and plane tickets. "Now we don't know our fate," the older Mohammad said.

Several months ago, he said, people working at the camp started saying, "Why don't you go back to Afghanistan? The country is calm and free now." He said a State Department representative has since offered money for those willing to go back.

Returning would mean certain death, Mohammad and his family say. His sister Faezeh, 29, is trying to stay optimistic, and says she hopes that "in the near future Trump changes his mind."

"Sometimes we think they're going to send us back by force. It's a very difficult worry," she added. "Especially for those of us that have nothing to go back to."

Original Article on Source

Source: "AOL Breaking"

Read More


Source: Breaking

Published: March 29, 2026 at 06:54AM on Source: PRIME TIME

#ShowBiz#Sports#Celebrities#Lifestyle

Left in limbo, Afghans who served with the U.S. fear Trump could send them back to the Taliban

Left in limbo, Afghans who served with the U.S. fear Trump could send them back to the Taliban Jennifer JettSun, Ma...
New Photo - Hurricane season storm names listed for 2026

Hurricane season storm names listed for 2026 Doyle Rice, USA TODAYSun, March 29, 2026 at 10:02 AM UTC 0 The Atlantic hurricane season officially begins on June 1, 2026, but meteorologists already have the list of names they will use to identify this season's tropical storms and hurricanes. Could there be a Tropical Storm Dolly in our future? How about Hurricane Hanna? Both are among the storm names you could hear as the sixmonthlong Atlantic hurricane season begins.

Hurricane season storm names listed for 2026

Doyle Rice, USA TODAYSun, March 29, 2026 at 10:02 AM UTC

0

The Atlantic hurricane season officially begins on June 1, 2026, but meteorologists already have the list of names they will use to identify this season's tropical storms and hurricanes.

Could there be a Tropical Storm Dolly in our future? How about Hurricane Hanna?

Both are among the storm names you could hear as the six-month-long Atlantic hurricane season begins.

Although most seasonal hurricane forecasts have yet to be released, it's likely that many will call for a near- to below-average season. This is due in part to the influence of an expected El Niño, a natural climate pattern that tends to reduce Atlantic hurricane activity.

Hurricane season outlook: Early hurricane season forecast sees 'very concerning trend'

A typical year averages about 14 tropical storms, seven of which spin into hurricanes, based on weather records that date from 1991 to 2020.

A tropical storm gets a name when its sustained winds reach 39 mph; it becomes a hurricane when its winds reach 74 mph.

The Saffir-Simpson scale categorizes hurricanes.

The World Meteorological Organization (WMO), located in Switzerland, chooses hurricane names several years in advance based on strict criteria. If a hurricane is particularly deadly or costly, its name is "retired" by the WMO and replaced by another one.

List of 2026 Atlantic hurricane season storm names -

Arthur

Bertha

Cristobal

Dolly

Edouard

Fay

Gonzalo

Hanna

Isaias

Josephine

Kyle

Leah

Marco

Nana

Omar

Paulette

Rene

Sally

Teddy

Vicky

Wilfred

Here's how to pronounce all of the 2026 hurricane names.

Advertisement

On Oct 28, 2025, a Copernicus Sentinel-2 satellite captured a vivid view of Hurricane Melissa's eye a few hours before landfall on Jamaica's southern coast.Why – and how – do hurricanes get names?

Before they started naming storms, hurricane forecasters had to refer to storms by saying something like "the storm 500 miles east-southeast of Miami." But the storm's position quickly changed.

Also, when more than one storm was going on at the same time, making it clear which storm was being described made the job even harder.

In 1953, the U.S. began using female names for hurricanes. By 1979, male and female names were being used. The names alternate between male and female.

The names are in alphabetical order, and each new storm gets the next name on the list.

There are no Q, U, X, Y or Z names because of the lack of usable names that begin with those letters.

More: Early hurricane season forecast sees 'very concerning trend'

Eastern Pacific hurricane names

There is a separate list for tropical storms and hurricanes that form in the eastern Pacific Ocean:

Amanda

Boris

Cristina

Douglas

Elida

Fausto

Genevieve

Hernan

Iselle

Julio

Karina

Lowell

Marie

Norbert

Odalys

Polo

Rachel

Simon

Trudy

Vance

Winnie

Xavier

Yolanda

Zeke

Eastern Pacific hurricanes seldom have any direct impact on the U.S., though they can batter the west coast of Mexico. The eastern Pacific season begins on May 15, more than two weeks earlier than the Atlantic season.

There is a separate list of names for Central Pacific hurricanes, which can occasionally hit Hawaii. In addition, there are separate lists for typhoons in the western Pacific and tropical cyclones in Australia and the Indian Ocean.

This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Full list of 2026 Atlantic hurricane season storm names

Original Article on Source

Source: "AOL Breaking"

Read More


Source: Breaking

Published: March 29, 2026 at 06:54AM on Source: PRIME TIME

#ShowBiz#Sports#Celebrities#Lifestyle

Hurricane season storm names listed for 2026

Hurricane season storm names listed for 2026 Doyle Rice, USA TODAYSun, March 29, 2026 at 10:02 AM UTC 0 The Atlantic hu...
New Photo - Record number of lawmakers retiring from Congress ahead of midterms

Record number of lawmakers retiring from Congress ahead of midterms BENJAMIN SIEGELSun, March 29, 2026 at 10:07 AM UTC 1 On Friday, Republican Congressman Sam Graves of Missouri became the 36th Republican and 57th House member to announce plans not to seek reelection, saying it was time to "pass the torch" to a new generation. Eric Lee/Getty Images, FILE PHOTO: In this Oct. 23, 2025, file photo, Rep. Sam Graves center, speaks alongside (LR) Rep. Lisa McClain, Rep. Tom Emmer, Speaker of the House Mike Johnson, and Rep. Steve Scalise, during a press conference at the U.S.

Record number of lawmakers retiring from Congress ahead of midterms

BENJAMIN SIEGELSun, March 29, 2026 at 10:07 AM UTC

1

On Friday, Republican Congressman Sam Graves of Missouri became the 36th Republican -- and 57th House member -- to announce plans not to seek re-election, saying it was time to "pass the torch" to a new generation.

Eric Lee/Getty Images, FILE - PHOTO: In this Oct. 23, 2025, file photo, Rep. Sam Graves center, speaks alongside (L-R) Rep. Lisa McClain, Rep. Tom Emmer, Speaker of the House Mike Johnson, and Rep. Steve Scalise, during a press conference at the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C.

In fact, more Republicans are retiring ahead of the midterms than at any point in nearly a century, according to an ABC News tally of retirement announcements and a review of historical data since 1930 compiled by the Brookings Institution.

Heading for the exits

That's a larger cohort than the 34 Republicans who did not run to keep their seats in 2018, when Republicans lost the majority in a 40-seat wave election to Democrats during the first Trump administration.

Takeaways from the first primaries of the 2026 election cycle

It includes powerful committee chairs, including Graves and Rep. Jodey Arrington of Texas, the Republican leader of the House Budget Committee; veterans such as retired Navy SEAL Rep. Morgan Luttrell of Texas and retired Air Force brigadier general Rep. Don Bacon of Nebraska; and 20 Republicans running for Senate or governor of their home states.

Two other Republicans, Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia and Rep. Mark Green of Tennessee, retired before the end of the term. Rep. Dan Crenshaw lost his primary in Texas this month.

"Republicans are staring down the barrel of the minority party, which is not a fulfilling place to be in federal politics in 2026," said Casey Burgat, the director of the Legislative Affairs Program at George Washington University.

So far, 21 House Democrats have announced plans to retire, more than the total that left ahead of the 2018 midterms, but less than the 29 Democrats who did not run for office again before the party lost the House majority in 2021.

Drew Angerer/Getty Images, FILE - PHOTO: In this May 10, 2023, file photo, Chair of the House Republican Conference Rep. Elise Stefanik looks on as Rep. Morgan Luttrell speaks during a news conference on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C.

Of that cohort, eight launched bids for Senate or governor of their home states. Another Democrat, former Rep. Mikie Sherrill of New Jersey, has already left Congress and won the New Jersey governor's race last fall.

Many reasons for leaving

Many of the lawmakers cited personal reasons, including long careers and their families, as shaping their decisions not to seek office again.

Others dropped re-election bids following redistricting fights that scrambled political maps and would have forced them to campaign in new districts.

Advertisement

House passes bill to fully fund DHS through May 22; top Democrat says 'dead on arrival' in Senate

The group of retiring members, particularly the Democrats, includes influential party leaders who have spent decades in Congress, including former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi of California, and former House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer of Maryland.

The 86-year-old Democrats began their political lives decades ago, as interns together in the 1960's for then-Maryland Sen. Daniel Brewster.

Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images, FILE - PHOTO: In this Feb. 14, 2024, file photo, Rep. Jodey Arrington , joined by Rep. Beth Van Duyne and Rep. Brian Babin, speaks at a press conference at the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C.

Still, some of the oldest members of Congress, such as 88-year-old Rep. Hal Rogers, R-Ky., and 87-year-old Rep. Maxine Waters, D-Calif., are running for re-election.

Rep. Jared Golden, 43, a moderate Democrat from Maine, surprised some colleagues when he announced plans to retire from his Trump-leaning district.

In his announcement, he pointed to the "increasing incivility and plain nastiness" of politics, and "recent incidents of political violence" that factored into his decision to leave public life.

Video Concern over rise in political violence

"As a father, I have to consider whether the good I can achieve outweighs everything my family endures as a result," he wrote in the Bangor Daily News.

Golden also voiced frustration with the state of Congress and the longest shutdown in government history last fall, arguing that the dysfunction led him to reconsider his options.

Robert F. Bukaty/AP, FILE - PHOTO: In this Oct. 25, 2024, file photo, Rep. Jared Golden attends an event in Lewiston, Maine.

With redistricting from both parties carving up the House map and leaving fewer truly competitive swing districts, politicians may be motivated by what helps them win primaries elections, over what can be done through legislative compromise across Capitol Hill, Burgat said.

"Compromise has become a dirty word," he told ABC News.

Original Article on Source

Source: "AOL Breaking"

Read More


Source: Breaking

Published: March 29, 2026 at 06:54AM on Source: PRIME TIME

#ShowBiz#Sports#Celebrities#Lifestyle

Record number of lawmakers retiring from Congress ahead of midterms

Record number of lawmakers retiring from Congress ahead of midterms BENJAMIN SIEGELSun, March 29, 2026 at 10:07 AM UTC...
New Photo - The real estate industry changed after an agent was killed on the job — but safety threats remain

The real estate industry changed after an agent was killed on the job — but safety threats remain Tim StellohSun, March 29, 2026 at 10:30 AM UTC 0 Homes in Palm Beach Gardens, Fla. (Zak Bennett / Bloomberg via Getty Images) The fatal shooting of a 27yearold real estate agent during an Iowa open house in 2011 shook her industry, which responded with a slate of measures aimed at keeping others in the profession safe.

The real estate industry changed after an agent was killed on the job — but safety threats remain

Tim StellohSun, March 29, 2026 at 10:30 AM UTC

0

Homes in Palm Beach Gardens, Fla. (Zak Bennett / Bloomberg via Getty Images)

The fatal shooting of a 27-year-old real estate agent during an Iowa open house in 2011 shook her industry, which responded with a slate of measures aimed at keeping others in the profession safe.

But in interviews with NBC News after an arrest last week in the long-dormant case, some in the industry said the barrage of threats and risks persist and not enough has been done to protect agents.

Gavin Blair, CEO of the Iowa Association of Realtors, described Ashley Okland's killing as a "worst case scenario" that pushed the industry to confront the sometimes dangerous reality of real estate work with a "safety pledge" of best practices.

What emerged in the years after Okland's death is a job that, in some ways, might be unrecognizable to past generations of agents. Many now carry guns or other means of self-protection, according to a survey released two years ago by the nation's largest real estate trade organization, the National Association of Realtors.

West Des Moines Assistant Police Chief Jody Hayes speaks about the arrest of Kristin Ramsey in the 2011 shooting death of Ashley Okland. (Zach Boyden-Holmes / Zach Boyden-Holmes/The Register/ USA Today Network via Imagn Images file) (Zach Boyden-Holmes)

In interviews, some agents said they screen would-be clients with a background check service before they ever speak. Some require identification for showings ahead of time and refuse to park in driveways to prevent being boxed in by a possible assailant. Such measures are included in the pledge.

Beth Andress, who with her husband, Rob Andress, teaches violence prevention and self-defense to real estate professionals in Canada and the U.S., described the potential dangers agents face as urgent and said certain safety measures should be required by law, and not merely recommended.

"We need to really understand that real estate is one of the only professions where you meet strangers alone in private, enclosed spaces, with no standardized screening process," Beth Andress said. "The entire industry has normalized that risk, so many people don't even recognize that risk anymore."

In a statement, a spokesperson for the National Association of Realtors said the organization "is committed to the welfare and safety of its members, with a sustained focus on providing resources, education, and research to support real estate professionals in the field. We strongly encourage state and local associations, brokerages, and members to keep safety top of mind every day of the year."

Making a deal or staying safe

Data included in the association's 2024 survey — its most recent — shows that nearly a quarter of the 1,423 respondents experienced a situation that made them fear for their personal safety or the safety of their personal information. That number was unchanged from the year before, the survey shows.

Nearly half of the respondents said their brokerage either did not have safety procedures in place or they weren't aware of such protocols. Forty percent said they'd met a new or prospective client alone at a secluded location. Nearly half said they'd shown a vacant property in an area with poor or no cell coverage in the last year.

The association spokesperson said the data shows progress from previous years, "underscoring the importance of continued education and tools that support agent safety in real-world conditions."

To Katy Caldwell, a longtime agent in Louisiana and co-host of the real estate podcast "Hustle Humbly," the data shows something else.

"There's no drastic change to the behavior of agents, because it's such a cutthroat industry," she said. "The vast majority of agents are barely making a living wage. You really don't want to turn away potential business."

But since those safety recommendations are not required, she said, agents may forgo them, fearing lost business from possible clients who aren't used to providing identification before a showing, for example. Or those possible clients may just walk away if the process isn't what they're used to, she said.

Other agents described the push for safety and the need to make a deal as a sometimes complicated balancing act.

Alex Harper, an agent in Texas, has a safety checklist that is robust. She often carries a gun, she said, and she uses an app to run background checks on any phone numbers she doesn't recognize. If she's meeting a man for a showing, she said, she'll have someone tag along. She never parks in driveways, she said, and any time she walks into a vacant home alone, she locks the door behind her.

"We're given the safety pledge of, hey, do your best to be safe," she said. "But at the same time, we have a fiduciary duty to our clients to sell their property. The phrasing and the verbiage and the way that these listing agreements read is like, you're going to do your utmost best to sell this property, and that means if someone calls you, you're going to show it."

The unpredictable nature of the job can easily tweak the best laid plans, said Chelsea Pearson, an agent in North Carolina who has her own safety checklist that includes carrying multiple "items" for protection during showings.

Advertisement

"You could be out showing a home, and you only have plans to show that one home, but then the client decides they want to see another home," she said. "And so it just gets added to your day and it's difficult to be able to plan it out."

Another factor that could be pushing agents — especially younger ones — to make deals at the expense of safety is the commission-based structure of the business, Harper said. Because agents are independent contractors, she added, they may have less support than employees.

Kristi Gonzales, a longtime agent in Texas, said that her brokerage, which Harper works for, is strong on safety issues — a reality that is far different than when she started in the industry nearly two decades ago. Back then, she said, there was no emphasis on safety.

It wasn't until Okland's killing, Gonzales said, that she began to take the issue seriously.

"We don't realize how vulnerable we are on a day-to-day basis just to do our jobs," she said.

A for sale sign outside of a home in Los Angeles. (Patrick T. Fallon / AFP via Getty Images) (Patrick T. Fallon)The Iowa killing that rocked the industry

Okland worked for Iowa Realty, the state's largest real estate company, when she was killed on April 8, 2011. At the time, she was working an open house in a West Des Moines townhouse development.

Authorities have released few details about her death, including a possible motive.

The woman charged in her murder, Kristin Ramsey, began working for a title and escrow company owned by Iowa Realty in the months after Okland's death, Iowa Realty said last week. Ramsey, 53, has been held in a Dallas County, Iowa, jail since March 17, with bail set at $2 million.

"Along with everyone in our community, we are understandably stunned," Iowa Realty said in a statement after Ramsey's arrest.

In a filing last week, Ramsey's attorneys said that she had no criminal record and a "seamless" employment history since her graduation from community college. She "adamantly" maintains her innocence, the filing states.

Harper, one of the Texas agents, said she was a senior in high school when Okland was killed and already knew she wanted to be a real estate agent. Now 31, she said that in her 13 years on the job, she's had more than 30 uncomfortable experiences.

Among them, she said, was a series of calls from a man who would spoof different phone numbers and begin by asking real estate questions. Those conversations devolved into vulgar comments, she said.

The calls began at 4 a.m. from a number that spoofed her office phone, Harper said, and they didn't end until months later, after she used an app that revealed the man's real phone number and her husband confronted him.

A neighborhood in Summit Valley, Calif. (David McNew / Getty Images file) (David McNew)Assaults, kidnappings, murder plots

In the Realtors' association survey, less than 4% of the respondents identified themselves as crime victims — a category that includes identity theft, robbery, assault and unidentified crimes. Media reports from across the United States last year showed allegations of agents being sexually assaulted, kidnapped and physically assaulted at open houses, showings and in a vacant home.

In Texas, a man was charged after allegedly sticking his camera up the skirt of an agent during a showing. In Minnesota, a man was sentenced to life in prison for plotting the murder of a real estate agent in part by luring her to a bogus showing.

Beth Andress said she and her husband have met hundreds of real estate professionals who are crime victims. The most common complaint was sexual harassment and assault, she said, and the majority of the victims did not report their allegations to their brokerages or authorities, often because they felt they wouldn't be taken seriously or out of fear that they'd develop a reputation for reporting "sexual advances."

To her, the key to preventing most of these situations is stronger workplace safety rules. Among the measures that should be required, they said, is safety education and standardized safety protocols across brokerages, she said. Agents should also have to request identification ahead of meetings and they should be trained on how to verify it, she said.

"Right now, that decision is left up to the individual agent, and it's inconsistent across the industry," she said. "Some agents ask for ID, some don't, and that inconsistency risks lives. This isn't about making things complicated — it's about creating a baseline where there's accountability before the meeting ever happens."

Original Article on Source

Source: "AOL Breaking"

Read More


Source: Breaking

Published: March 29, 2026 at 06:54AM on Source: PRIME TIME

#ShowBiz#Sports#Celebrities#Lifestyle

The real estate industry changed after an agent was killed on the job — but safety threats remain

The real estate industry changed after an agent was killed on the job — but safety threats remain Tim StellohSun, Ma...
New Photo - Ukraine battles a brutal Russian offensive as Iran war takes the world's focus

Ukraine battles a brutal Russian offensive as Iran war takes the world&x27;s focus Daryna MayerSun, March 29, 2026 at 9:00 AM UTC 1 KYIV, Ukraine — With the world's attention shifting to the escalating conflict in the Middle East, Russia is pushing forward with a spring offensive in Ukraine despite months of peace talks that no longer appear to be Washington's priority.

Ukraine battles a brutal Russian offensive as Iran war takes the world's focus

Daryna MayerSun, March 29, 2026 at 9:00 AM UTC

1

KYIV, Ukraine — With the world's attention shifting to the escalating conflict in the Middle East, Russia is pushing forward with a spring offensive in Ukraine despite months of peace talks that no longer appear to be Washington's priority.

While Moscow seeks to regain momentum and capture more territory four years into its full-scale invasion, Ukrainians caught up in the conflict told NBC News their hopes that President Donald Trump will settle their war while waging another in Iran are dwindling.

The Iran war is "definitely a distraction," Senior Sgt. Volodymyr Rzhavskyi said. Rzhavskyi, 44, has been serving since 2014, when Russian-backed separatists first began fighting in Ukraine's east. He has little faith in the peace talks, but remains "a hopeless optimist" that Ukraine "can win in this war, not just hold on, but win."

In a phone interview from the Donetsk region, where he is currently stationed, Rzhavskyi said that with Trump preoccupied, Ukraine must continue to defend itself. "This is not a sprint, it's a marathon," Rzhavskyi said. "We must dissuade the Russians from encroaching on anything Ukrainian for at least another hundred years."

Oleksandr, a lieutenant who is serving in Ukraine's south and did not want his last name or age revealed due to the sensitive nature of his service, said he is also ready to fight on. "As long as they push, we will kill them," he said in a series of audio notes from the front lines. "We see that the peace process is deadlocked. Russia is asking for what we can't give it — our land," he added.

Russia's latest push to alter a largely static front line has come at a steep human cost. In just one week, more than 8,710 Russian troops were killed or seriously wounded in Ukraine as Moscow intensified its "offensive actions," Ukraine's commander in chief, Col. Gen. Oleksandr Syrskyi, said Monday. His Russian counterpart, Gen. Valery Gerasimov, said last week that his troops were on the offensive "across the entire front line" and had taken 12 Ukrainian settlements in the first two weeks of March. Neither Russia nor Ukraine regularly reports the number of their own war dead, wounded or missing.

The Washington-based Institute for the Study of War, which has analyzed the battlefield situation in Ukraine since 2022, said in an assessment on Monday that the reported Russian casualty rate during the spring offensive was "unsustainable given Russia's current recruitment rates and would likely degrade Russia's ability to wage such large assaults in the mid- to long-term." It remains unlikely this year that Russian forces will seize the so-called "Fortress Belt," the main fortified defensive line in the fiercely contested eastern region of Donetsk, the assessment said, with Moscow likely to make some tactical gains at a significant cost.

The land that Ukraine still holds in Donetsk is at the center of a stalemate in negotiations after Kyiv refused to give it up in exchange for peace. Russian President Vladimir Putin has said he would seize Donetsk by force and take full control of the Donbas region, composed of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions, should the diplomatic track fail.

Footage released by the Russian Defense Ministry on Monday shows a Russian soldier firing artillery toward a Ukrainian position. (Russian Defense Ministry Press Service via AP) (Russian Defense Ministry Press Service via AP)

A core part of Russia's information campaign is that a Ukrainian defeat is somehow inevitable because Moscow has a continuous battlefield momentum, said Christopher Tuck, an expert in conflict and security at King's College London. But the events of the last couple of months show that those assumptions are false, Tuck said.

"While Ukraine remains under sustained pressure, its battlefield performance demonstrates that its forces continue to be resilient and adaptive, capable of conducting successful local counterattacks and of leveraging new technologies and methods, especially in realms such as drones and artificial intelligence, to offset their numerical inferiority," he said, referring to Ukraine's lingering struggle to recruit more troops.

Meanwhile, Russia continues to be wedded to a method of war that relies on attrition, scale and firepower.

Advertisement

"Overall, this has allowed Russia to retain the initiative in some areas, but it absolutely has not established for Putin an irreversible path to victory," Tuck said. "At the moment, neither side believes the war has been decided, and so the conflict is likely to continue."

Even as his own war with Iran rages, Trump has pressured Ukraine to come to an agreement, accusing President Volodymyr Zelenskyy of stalling the peace process in an interview with NBC News earlier this month. Zelenskyy told Reuters on Wednesday that Washington had tied security guarantees for Ukraine, critical to the proposed peace deal, to Kyiv ceding the entire Donbas to Russia.

Trump told reporters Tuesday that Russia and Ukraine were "getting close" to a deal, but conceded he has been "saying that for a while" after well over a year of mediation efforts. The Kremlin responded on Wednesday, saying it expects the U.S. to "continue its goodwill" as it also denied Thursday that Putin has lost interest in a peace settlement since the Iran war broke out.

Iran's retaliatory attacks on neighboring Persian Gulf states have disrupted the trilateral talks between the U.S., Ukraine and Russia, some of which took place in the Middle East in the weeks before the Iran war. They have yet to resume in the same format.

Military medic Vadym said he and his fellow medics on the front lines have "very few illusions" that diplomacy can lead to peace on Ukraine's terms. (Courtesy of Rubigh Battalion ) (Courtesy of Rubigh Battalion)

Military medic Vadym, who did not want to reveal his last name due to his service on the front lines in the Donetsk region, said he and his colleagues witness firsthand the human cost of the raging war, rescuing wounded soldiers daily. They harbor "very few illusions" that diplomacy can lead to peace on Ukraine's terms, Vadym, who worked at a Kyiv hospital before he joined the army in 2024, said on the phone Tuesday. "There is a feeling that we are in a deadlock, and no one wants to give up territories or ambitions," he said.

The escalation in the Middle East has drained both attention and resources away from Ukraine, Vadym, 31, added. While he thinks Trump has not fully lost his interest in settling the war, the attention of global leaders can only stretch so far. "It's like dealing with one patient, where all your resources are focused on that person, versus looking after an entire ward."

Oleksandr, the lieutenant, hopes that Trump is "just more focused on a quick victory in Iran right now" and has not fully lost interest in Ukraine. The fates of the two conflicts are linked, he added, as Tehran was indirectly involved by supplying Russia with weapons and expertise.

Retaining the world's attention on his nation's fight is exactly what Zelenskyy appeared to try to do as he went on a tour of European capitals last week to ramp up support for Ukraine.

Zelenskyy told the BBC he had a "very bad feeling" about the impact of the U.S. operation in Iran on the war in Ukraine, fearing a deficit of Patriot missiles, which are being used to deflect Iran's retaliatory strikes on its neighbors. The missiles are in short supply in Ukraine as it continues to deflect Russia's near daily attacks.

But Tehran is Russia's ally, and any damage to its political regime is "good news" for Ukraine, said Sviatoslav Yurash, a member of Ukraine's parliament and a serving soldier. Kyiv should concentrate on helping its allies to contain "the evil multiplied by countries like Iran and Russia."

Yurash said he is "hoping against hope" that negotiations will succeed, but the reality is that Russia can't be trusted when it comes to peace agreements. "I can't focus on optimism when I understand that Putin continues to talk about his desires and dreams to take all of Ukraine."

Original Article on Source

Source: "AOL Breaking"

Read More


Source: Breaking

Published: March 29, 2026 at 05:54AM on Source: PRIME TIME

#ShowBiz#Sports#Celebrities#Lifestyle

Ukraine battles a brutal Russian offensive as Iran war takes the world's focus

Ukraine battles a brutal Russian offensive as Iran war takes the world&x27;s focus Daryna MayerSun, March 29, 2026...
New Photo - Looking to limit birthright citizenship, Trump turns to an 1884 ruling against a Native American

Looking to limit birthright citizenship, Trump turns to an 1884 ruling against a Native American Lawrence HurleySun, March 29, 2026 at 9:00 AM UTC 0 "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States," the 14th Amendment states.

Looking to limit birthright citizenship, Trump turns to an 1884 ruling against a Native American

Lawrence HurleySun, March 29, 2026 at 9:00 AM UTC

0

"All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States," the 14th Amendment states. (Justine Goode / NBC News; Getty Images) (Justine Goode)

WASHINGTON — In a moment that could take on new significance almost 150 years later, Omaha election official Charles Wilkins on April 5, 1880, refused to register John Elk to vote on the grounds that he was Native American, and therefore not an American citizen.

Elk — believed to have been a member of what is now known as the Winnebago Tribe of Nebraska — objected, saying he had severed all ties with his tribe and had willingly subjected himself to the authority of the United States.

He launched a legal challenge, arguing among other things that he was a citizen at birth because he was born within United States territory.

But the Supreme Court, in an 1884 case called Elk v. Wilkins, ruled against him, saying that Native Americans born within the territory of the United States did not have birthright citizenship. They had the same status as "the children of subjects of any foreign government born within the domain of that government," the court said.

President Donald Trump's administration is now citing that case as it defends his plan to end automatic birthright citizenship, putting a new spin on the long-standing interpretation of the Constitution's 14th Amendment. The Supreme Court hears oral arguments in the case on Wednesday.

Trump's executive order, issued on the first day of his second term, seeks to limit birthright citizenship only to people with at least one parent who is a U.S. citizen or a legal permanent resident.

The order is not in effect; lower courts put it on hold.

Solicitor General D. John Sauer, representing the government, referenced Elk in court papers, saying the Supreme Court has "squarely rejected the premise that anyone born in U.S. territory, no matter the circumstances, is automatically a citizen so long as the federal government can regulate them."

White House spokeswoman Abigail Jackson said in a statement that the case gives the Supreme Court the chance to "restore the meaning of citizenship in the United States to its original public meaning."

The Trump administration's arguments about the relevance of the Elk ruling are strongly contested by the American Civil Liberties Union, which is leading the challenge to Trump's executive order.

"At a fundamental level, this case is about an attempt to strip citizenship from the children of immigrants who have always been citizens of the U.S. The Native American questions the government raises are really beside the point," ACLU lawyer Cody Wofsy said in an interview.

Tribal status is 'unique'

Notably absent from any of the dozens of briefs filed in the case is anything from Native American tribes or organizations. Two scholars of Native American law, Bethany Berger at the University of Iowa College of Law and Gregory Ablavsky at Stanford Law School, did file a brief backing the ACLU's challenge.

Experts on Native American law told NBC News the administration's reliance on Elk was problematic, both rhetorically and legally.

"We believe the reliance on Elk to deny birthright citizenship to children of undocumented immigrants is misplaced. It's a misreading and a misunderstanding," said Leonard Fineday, general counsel of the National Congress of American Indians, which represents tribes.

The Elk decision rests solely on the specific nature of "quasi-sovereign tribal government" and is limited to that context, he added.

Monte Mills, director of the Native American Law Center at the University of Washington School of Law, agreed, saying it was ironic that the government would rely on such a ruling.

"It does betray a lack of understanding and awareness or willingness to acknowledge the nuance of Native American law," he added.

Advertisement

Another lawyer who works on Native American issues, who declined to be named because he did not want to be seen to be speaking on behalf of tribes with diverse views, said Indian law, a technical term still in use, is complex and not applicable to other areas of law. That's in part because there was never a blanket rule that applied to all tribes when it came to their legal relationship with the United States.

"I would say Native American history is anomalous. The status of tribes is unique. I'd at least be very cautious before trying to import any supposed lessons or principles from that context into other areas," the lawyer said.

The legal status of Native Americans within the U.S. has been addressed at length throughout history as the nation expanded westward, making — and breaking — treaties with tribes along the way and often mistreating them. The U.S. government simultaneously considered tribes to be somewhat independent nations while also exerting authority over them.

Tribes and Native American organizations likely did not file briefs in the birthright citizenship case for at least two reasons, Indian law experts said. First, they do not have a stake in the case because, since 1924, Native Americans have been guaranteed birthright citizenship via statute. Second, the more than 500 tribes likely differ politically on whether Trump's executive order is good policy.

"I do suspect some tribes would be supportive of the policy because some tribes are pretty politically conservative," the lawyer who works on Native American issues said.

'Subject to the jurisdiction thereof'

The unusual case focuses on the meaning of the "citizenship clause" of the 14th Amendment, ratified in 1868 after the Civil War and the end of slavery. It states: "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States."

It's long been understood to confer citizenship on almost anyone born in the United States, regardless of their legal status. Exceptions include children born to diplomats and foreign invaders.

The Trump administration has zeroed in on "subject to the jurisdiction thereof," arguing it excludes both the children of people who entered the country illegally and those born to people with temporary legal status, such as work visas.

The Elk case is mentioned multiple times in the Trump administration's brief, with Sauer arguing that it shows birthright citizenship only applies to people who are subject to the "political jurisdiction" of the United States.

He quoted a line from the Elk ruling that says the "main object" of the citizenship clause was to address the issue of freed slaves after the Civil War.

The challengers, Sauer wrote, "cannot explain the long-established exceptions to birthright citizenship, including for children of tribal Indians."

Those backing the traditional understanding of birthright citizenship point to another 19th-century ruling, this one from 1898. In United States v. Wong Kim Ark, the court ruled that a man born in San Francisco to parents originally from China but living in the United States was an American citizen at birth.

The majority opinions in Elk and Ark were both authored by Justice Horace Gray. In the latter ruling, Gray distinguished his earlier opinion in the Elk case, saying it concerned "only members of Indian tribes within the United States and had no tendency to deny citizenship to children born in the United States" who were not Native American.

In his brief, Sauer downplayed the Ark ruling, saying it recognized birthright citizenship only for children of citizens and those born to immigrants who were permanent residents.

Ilan Wurman, a professor at the University of Minnesota Law School who filed a brief backing Trump, said it is unclear how much weight the Supreme Court will give the Elk case.

"The bottom line is that the case is helpful to the government, but it's ambiguous," he added.

Berger, the Native American legal expert who filed a brief in support of the challengers, said in an interview that Sauer's argument echoes what his predecessor argued in Wong Kim Ark's case more than a century ago.

"What the government is doing now is a retread of what it tried to and failed to do before," she added.

Original Article on Source

Source: "AOL Breaking"

Read More


Source: Breaking

Published: March 29, 2026 at 05:54AM on Source: PRIME TIME

#ShowBiz#Sports#Celebrities#Lifestyle

Looking to limit birthright citizenship, Trump turns to an 1884 ruling against a Native American

Looking to limit birthright citizenship, Trump turns to an 1884 ruling against a Native American Lawrence HurleySun,...
New Photo - The anesthesiologist, the nuclear engineer and an alleged attempted murder on a hike in Hawaii

The anesthesiologist, the nuclear engineer and an alleged attempted murder on a hike in Hawaii Eric Levenson, CNNSun, March 29, 2026 at 9:00 AM UTC 0 Dr. Gerhardt Konig in court for his trial on Tuesday in Honolulu, Hawaii. KITV Looking at the steep cliffs just feet from her, Arielle Konig felt uncomfortable. The nuclear engineer and her husband, 47yearold anesthesiologist Dr. Gerhardt Konig, were hiking Oahu's "Pali Puka" trail to celebrate her 36th birthday.

The anesthesiologist, the nuclear engineer and an alleged attempted murder on a hike in Hawaii

Eric Levenson, CNNSun, March 29, 2026 at 9:00 AM UTC

0

Dr. Gerhardt Konig in court for his trial on Tuesday in Honolulu, Hawaii. - KITV

Looking at the steep cliffs just feet from her, Arielle Konig felt uncomfortable.

The nuclear engineer and her husband, 47-year-old anesthesiologist Dr. Gerhardt Konig, were hiking Oahu's "Pali Puka" trail to celebrate her 36th birthday. They took the weekend trip from their home in Maui after a rough few months in their relationship in the wake of what she acknowledged was an "emotional affair" with a coworker.

The Konigs had gone to couples counseling and worked to regain each other's trust, she said. And after receiving a love-filled birthday card on the morning of March 24, 2025, Arielle believed things were on the upswing.

"I teared up when I read it," she said. "I felt hopeful that this was a turning point for us in our marriage and that this was going to be a nice trip and the start of the next chapter for us."

The hike certainly began a new chapter for them – but not how she expected.

Her discomfort with the hike quickly turned into terror when she says her husband shoved her toward the cliff, tried to inject her with a syringe and bashed her head repeatedly with a rock.

"It was just very shocking," she said. "My initial reaction was he must be kidding."

This week, exactly a year to the day from that hike, Arielle Konig took the stand in a Honolulu courtroom and accused her husband of trying to kill her. She survived, she said, because she fought back and screamed until two fellow hikers arrived and intervened.

Her dramatic testimony represents the key evidence in the past two weeks of Gerhardt Konig's trial on an attempted second-degree murder charge. The trial has featured evidence of a tense divorce and child custody battle and has spurred a deeper examination of how this high-achieving couple came to sit across from each other in court.

In opening statements, prosecutors laid out the details of the attack and said Gerhardt Konig confessed to his 19-year-old son in a FaceTime conversation. He then allegedly hid from police for hours until he was apprehended around sunset while trying flee, prosecutors said.

His defense attorney, Thomas Otake, acknowledged Konig hit his wife with the rock but argued it was not a premeditated attack. He said she was the one who started the fight by hitting him first. Konig did not try to push her off a cliff, and there were no syringes involved, the attorney said.

"This was an unplanned, unanticipated scuffle that happened between a couple," he said.

The defendant could take the stand in his own defense. Testimony is set to resume Tuesday.

Trouble in paradise

Gerhardt and Arielle married in 2018, and they had a son in 2020 and another in 2023.

Born in South Africa, Gerhardt also has two children from an earlier marriage, his attorney said. Arielle, a nuclear engineer, works as a project manager for a nuclear energy company, she testified. The couple moved with their children to Maui in 2023, she testified.

In late 2024, she became close with a male coworker, sending him "flirty texts" and then deleting them so her husband wouldn't see them, she testified. She described it as an "emotional affair," saying it never became physical and there were no racy photos sent.

When Gerhardt found out in December 2024, "he was angry and upset," she said, and looked through her phone almost every day. They went to couples counseling for several months as they tried to repair their trust issues.

Then came the idea for a couples trip to the nearby island of Oahu. Arielle had wanted to go to Oahu "at some point," she said, and he planned a trip around her March 24 birthday.

They arrived to Oahu on March 23 and went to a spa and had dinner, she testified. The following morning, he gave her the birthday card. "Happy birthday, angelface," he wrote in the card. "There isn't an obstacle in this world too hard for me to fight through for you."

They planned to go to a hike that day and had made dinner reservations that night, she testified.

'He grabbed me really forcefully'

The Pali Puka trail is a popular hike about a 13-minute drive from Honolulu.

The wooded and rocky trail is short yet steep. It's only about one mile out and back, but the path traverses along a narrow ridge and requires hikers to scramble up rocky slopes before ending in a beautiful view of the coastline, a local hiking company explains.

Arielle and Gerhardt drove to the trail and began the trek at about 10 a.m., taking photos along the way and sending them to family on Snapchat, according to her testimony.

But after about a quarter-mile, she said she became uncomfortable with the steepness of the hike and refused to go on. Gerhardt went ahead for a bit, and when he returned, he expressed surprise she was still there, she said.

Advertisement

They took a selfie near the edge of the cliff as she held on to a tree, she testified, when he startled her.

"When I walked up to him, he grabbed me really forcefully by my upper arms, and he said, 'I'm so f—ing sick of this shit, get back over there.' He starts pushing me back towards the cliff," she testified.

She wrestled with him to try to get away, she said. She threw herself to the ground and held onto trees and shrubs so he couldn't push her off the edge, she testified. He then straddled her with his legs across her waist, holding an unexpected item, she said.

"He was on top of me, he had a syringe in his hand and he said, 'Hold still,'" she testified.

A shove, a struggle and a rock

She batted at his hand and the syringe fell to the ground, she said. He dug into his backpack with his left hand and held her down with his right arm while holding a vial of some liquid, she said.

"I'm screaming, I'm saying, 'What the f— are you doing, get off me.' He's saying like, 'f— you, you're done, I'm so sick of your shit, I'm so done with you,'" she testified.

She bit his forearm and squeezed his testicles as she screamed for help during the struggle, she said.

"He's saying, 'Shut the f— up. Nobody is going to hear you out here. Nobody is coming to save you.' I'm saying, 'You can't do this. Everyone knows we're on a hike, they'll know this wasn't an accident, and our kids will be orphans. You'll go to jail and I'll be dead. You have to stop.' He's saying, 'You're done, we don't need you anymore,'" she said.

He seemed to calm down a bit, she said. But then he repeatedly bashed her in the head with a rock as many as 10 times, she said.

"I just started screaming, because in my mind he's trying to knock me unconscious to be able to drag me over the edge. I was just screaming then as much as I could," she testified.

Finally, she heard a woman's voice say, "We're here and we're calling 911," she testified. "He froze and knelt back away from me. I crawled away really slowly."

The two women helped Arielle hobble down to safety, while Gerhardt stayed there frozen, she testified.

The women – registered nurses Amanda Morris and Sarah Buchsbaum – testified earlier in the trial that they had just begun their hike when they heard a woman screaming and saw a man hitting her with a rock. They identified the attacking man in court as the defendant.

Body-camera footage from responding officers also showed Arielle's bloodied face and head in the trail parking lot afterward. She was taken to the hospital for treatment.

Husband arrested, then indicted

Arielle Konig displays a scar on her forehead during her testimony in Gerhardt Konig's trial. - Pool/KITV

Meanwhile, Gerhardt Konig called his 19-year-old son on FaceTime, and while covered in blood, confessed that he tried to kill Arielle because he believed she had been cheating on him for months, according to prosecutors.

Police searched for him for hours and arrested him that night after he tried to flee, prosecutors said. He was indicted by a grand jury a week later.

Arielle Konig was treated for severe lacerations and stayed at the hospital for one night, she testified. She had stitches in her scalp and sports scars on her head and face, she said. In court, she pulled back the bangs covering the left side of her forehead to reveal a patch of scalp that no longer grows hair.

In cross-examination, the defense attorney suggested she was making false statements in an attempt to get his money and house.

After the alleged attack, she moved over $120,000 from their joint bank account to her own personal account to pay their mortgage, car, credit card bill and child care, she testified. She also filed for divorce, and their children are in her custody.

On cross-examination, Arielle Konig confirmed she had requested full custody of their children and possession of their house in their divorce and custody case. The verdict in this criminal trial will be relevant to that decision, she acknowledged.

"You and your divorce attorney are using the allegations in this case as a basis to ask for certain things in the divorce and custody case, correct?" said Otake, the defense attorney.

"Yes, in certain cases where it's applicable," she said.

If convicted, Gerhardt Konig faces a sentence of life in prison with the possibility of parole.

For more CNN news and newsletters create an account at CNN.com

Original Article on Source

Source: "AOL Breaking"

Read More


Source: Breaking

Published: March 29, 2026 at 05:54AM on Source: PRIME TIME

#ShowBiz#Sports#Celebrities#Lifestyle

The anesthesiologist, the nuclear engineer and an alleged attempted murder on a hike in Hawaii

The anesthesiologist, the nuclear engineer and an alleged attempted murder on a hike in Hawaii Eric Levenson, CNNSun, M...

 

PRIME SKY © 2015 | Distributed By My Blogger Themes | Designed By Templateism.com