New Photo - Wrongfully convicted Michigan dad sues: 'They did me wrong'

Wrongfully convicted Michigan dad sues: 'They did me wrong' Tresa Baldas, Detroit Free Press December 1, 2025 at 2:04 PM 7 Behind prison walls, they called him "Baby Killer." It was a torturous nickname for Michael Griffin, who was serving a life sentence for the death of his infant daughter — a crime he adamantly denies. He said she fell from a baby swing inside their home in Flint, Michigan, and died the next day from a failed surgery. But the police, he said, were hellbent on blaming him for her death, accusing him of abusing her, and trying to bully a confession out of him.

- - Wrongfully convicted Michigan dad sues: 'They did me wrong'

Tresa Baldas, Detroit Free Press December 1, 2025 at 2:04 PM

7

Behind prison walls, they called him "Baby Killer."

It was a torturous nickname for Michael Griffin, who was serving a life sentence for the death of his infant daughter — a crime he adamantly denies. He said she fell from a baby swing inside their home in Flint, Michigan, and died the next day from a failed surgery. But the police, he said, were hell-bent on blaming him for her death, accusing him of abusing her, and trying to bully a confession out of him.

"'Tell us what you did or the doctors won't help your daughter,'" Griffin recalled the police telling him during a three-hour-long interrogation as his daughter clung to life. He described it as a futile back-and-forth:

"I'm telling you the truth."

Michael Griffin, 35, of Flint, sits on a couch with his wife, Kalesha Journeay, 33, in the living room of their home in Flint on Tuesday, Nov. 18, 2025. When he was 19, Griffin's daughter died after falling from a baby swing, and he was blamed for her death. He was convicted of murder and sentenced to life in prison, though he would profess his innocence for the next 14 years. He was exonerated after medical evidence showed a botched surgery caused her daughter's death. He is now suing over his wrongful conviction, alleging the police, hospital and forensic officials covered up their mistakes.

"No, you're not."

"She fell out of her swing."

"No, she didn't."

"They kept telling me I was lying," recalled Griffin, who at 19 would get charged, convicted at trial and sent to prison, where the "Baby Killer" taunts would tear his guts out for years, triggering fights with those who dared utter it.

"I had to keep telling myself, 'I didn't do it,' Even if the truth never came out," Griffin said in a recent, exclusive interview with the Free Press.

But the truth did eventually come out, Griffin said. In 2023 he was exonerated with the help of the Michigan Innocence Clinic and attorney Mike Morse. Two years into his freedom, he is now suing to hold those accountable for, as he puts it, framing him for a crime that he never committed, and robbing him of 14 years of his life.

'I kept telling myself — I know they did me wrong'

In a wrongful prosecution lawsuit unfolding in U.S. District Court, Griffin alleges that his daughter's death was caused by a failed surgical procedure, and that police, doctors and forensic officials conspired to transform a "tragic household accident into a fabricated homicide." Specifically, the suit alleges, investigators and medical personnel built a false narrative of child abuse, coerced a confession through fear and deceit, then falsified police and medical reports and altered autopsy findings to match their story.

"When I was locked up, I kept telling myself, 'I know they did me wrong,' " Griffin said. "But I didn't think it could be proven."

Griffin's lawsuit is against the city of Flint, Genesee County, two Flint police officers, three doctors, three officials with the medical examiner's office and the Hurley Medical Center where his daughter was taken for treatment. Through multiple lawyers and agency officials, all declined comment for this article.

Among the lawsuit's allegations:

There was no physical evidence of blunt force trauma, yet the police and doctors pushed this theory, and a medical examiner listed it as cause of death on the autopsy report, which also noted the existence of a prior head injury, a bruise on the baby's face and the occurrence of an unsuccessful craniotomy. Yet, "without any evidence" that the injuries were caused by the dad as opposed to the failed craniotomy, the medical examiner determined that cause of death was "Blunt Force Injury of the Head" and the manner of death was "homicide."

In the middle of Griffin's trial, the autopsy report was changed after a doctor testified that no evidence existed to support a finding of "Blunt Force Trauma." A medical examiner then sent the prosecution an "" autopsy report, changing the cause of death to "Abusive Head Injury." A doctor testified that this phrase is used when there is no way to determine how injuries occur, and "admitted" that it was used "to reflect that the doctors did not know what happened to Naviah."

A doctor had discovered a prior head injury in the baby, yet the jury was never informed about how the baby's fall could have reinjured that previous injury. As it turned out, a CT scan showed a new brain bleed had developed, which triggered the need for the surgery that ultimately failed.

The police report stated that Griffin's interrogation was videotaped. The prosecutor also said the same at trial, yet the videotape has never been produced. Griffin's lawyers filed a Freedom of Information Act request for it, but the city of Flint said the video doesn't exist.

Griffin was arrested without a warrant.

A medical examiner testified that she performed an autopsy on the child at 9 a.m., but the baby was still in surgery at that time, and was not pronounced dead until 1:10 p.m.

An investigator with the medical examiner's office lied in his written report — and later to jurors — when he claimed that the mom told him that she believed her daughter had been abused by the father. The mom testified that this never happened.

"There were desperate measures taken here to ensure that Michael would be blamed for the death of his daughter," said attorney Adam Akeel, who is representing Griffin in the lawsuit. He noted the prosecution "showed a shaken-baby video to the jury" when there was no evidence supporting this theory.

"It's them pushing this false narrative to pin it on the dad," Akeel said, "when they all admit that they had no facts to support that it was caused by him."

How Griffin went from grieving parent to murder suspect in 24 hours

According to court records, trial testimony, interviews with lawyers and Griffin, these are the events that unfolded in the fall of 2009, when Griffin's daughter wound up in the Emergency Room at Hurley Medical Center in Flint with a bruise under her eye:

On Sept. 30, 2009, Griffin was home with his daughter while the baby's mom walked to a corner market to buy snacks at about 5 p.m. Both parents were just 19, living in a two-story apartment in Flint with baby Naviah, whose dad had placed her in a motorized infant swing upstairs while her mom went out. He secured her with the attached tray that latched across her lap. He did not use the seat belt. He then went downstairs and played video games, when eventually, he heard a loud thump. He said he thought it might be the neighbors.

But when he went upstairs, he said he found the baby face down on the hardwood floor.

Michael Griffin, center, 33, of Flint, has his hands massaged by his then-fiancée, Kalesha Journeay, 31, while sitting on the front porch of his mother's house on Flint's west side on Friday, May 5, 2023, shortly after Griffin was released from prison on bond. When he was 19, Griffin's daughter died after falling from a baby swing, and he was blamed for her death. He was convicted of murder and sentenced to life in prison, though he would profess his innocence for the next 14 years. He was exonerated after medical evidence showed a botched surgery caused her daughter's death. He is now suing over his wrongful conviction, alleging the police, hospital and forensic officials covered up their mistakes.

"I panicked and picked her up," Griffin recalled. "I remember this clear as day — as soon as I picked her up, her head went limp on my shoulder. She wasn't crying."

Griffin said he set her on the bed when he heard a knock at the door. It was Naviah's mom. He ran downstairs with the baby and opened the door. Before he could say what had happened, the mom grabbed the baby, who had stopped breathing, ran out the front door and yelled for help. An apartment security guard performed CPR on the baby and resuscitated her before the ambulance arrived and transported her to Hurley Medical Center.

When she got to the hospital, she had a bruise under her right eye and no other external injuries. But the parents would learn overnight that her brain had swollen, and that she would need surgery. A CT scan had revealed a "tiny" and "thin" bleed on the left side of Naviah's brain, and a cystic hygroma — or benign tumor — was discovered on the right side of her brain. This meant that a prior injury had occurred and healed, but was "dangerously susceptible to reinjury," the lawsuit states.

After discovering the existence of the cystic hygroma, hospital officials contacted Child Protective Services and the Flint police, who would interrogate both parents at the police station. Mom went first, telling police that she and Griffin had a good relationship, that he treats her and the baby well and had never abused either of them; and that she had no reason to believe that he would harm their child.

Mom also informed the officers that Naviah had a tendency to kick up the latched tray and pull herself up and out of her swing, and that she had previously done so on multiple occasions.

The police, though, allegedly criticized the mom for trusting the dad, telling her the doctors did not believe Griffin's story about the swing fall, and neither did they.

Fifteen years later, Naviah's mom — who said she initially "didn't want to believe" that Griffin could have hurt their child — says after years of researching the case and rethinking the details, the medical testimony and Griffin's story, she doesn't believe Griffin is telling the truth. And though she testified for the prosecution at his trial — at times providing favorable testimony for the dad — she said she believes Griffin did something that caused her child's death, and is hiding something.

Mom: 'Something happened at that house … that he's not taking accountability for'

For 36-year-old Alecia Patton, Naviah's mother, the pain, sadness and trauma of losing a child has never gone away. Though grateful for the experience to become a mom again — she now has a 10-year-old son and 13-year-old daughter — she still grieves Naviah everyday, she said. And the memory of what happened that tragic day still haunts her, in part, because she believes Griffin is hiding something.

"Something happened at the house that caused her to go to the hospital that he's not taking accountability for," Patton said in a recent interview with the Free Press.

That hospital visit was especially traumatic for Patton, who also lost her father that day. He had come to the hospital to be with her after learning about Naviah, when he died suddenly of a health issue inside his car in the parking lot, just 10 minutes after Naviah died.

"He didn't want her to be alone — that's what I tell myself to keep going," Patton said.

With back-to-back tragedies to contend with, Patton would get hit with another major event in just a matter of days. Her baby's father would be charged with murder.

"I didn't want to believe it," said Patton, who recalled going through a mix of emotions: Anger. Confusion. Sadness. But as time passed, she said, and she had a chance to research the case and process the medical information, she came to a conclusion:

"I was faced with reality — that he's the reason behind her being deceased," said Patton, who cut off all ties with Griffin shortly after her daughter's death.

Patton said she didn't believe Griffin's "she fell out of the swing" explanation: "It just didn't make sense. It never did make sense."

Patton, who is now a certified nursing assistant, said she also doesn't believe that her daughter died from a failed surgery, maintaining that it was Griffin who caused her daughter to be in the hospital in the first place.

"If, whatever happened at the house hadn't happened, then the doctors would not have had to try to get the fluid off her brain," Patton said. "I asked them to do what they could do to try to save her, and they did the best they could do."

'I want to know the truth ... She didn't deserve what happened to her'

It's been more than 10 years since Patton has spoken to Griffin. Their last conversation was a prison phone call.

"I asked him to tell me the truth of what happened," recalled Patton, who said Griffin told her that if she came in person to see him in prison, "he would tell me what happened."

But that prison visit never occurred. Patton said her application to visit him was denied, and she didn't pursue the matter further.

Still, she said, she has never stopped wondering what happened.

"I want to know the truth," she said. "Something happened. … I'm the mother. And I don't know what happened to my first-born child. It's not fair. She didn't deserve what happened to her."

When Griffin was exonerated, Patton said she was blindsided.

"I went into a dark hole. … I wasn't expecting it," Patton said, later adding: "Everybody is saying he deserves a second chance. I feel like, 'leave well enough alone.' "

As for second chances, Patton said: "I'm not God. I can't say what nobody deserves. … But I would be more comfortable if he were in prison. Justice was served before he got out."

As for Griffin's lawsuit, she said: "He's going for money, and all I want is the truth."

Dad says police bullied him with threats to get a false confession

Griffin maintains he has been truthful from the start, and that he was railroaded by police when they first took him in for questioning while his daughter fought for her life. According to Griffin, trial transcripts, and court records, here's what happened:

At the start of the interrogation, the officers closed the door, according to official reports. Then they reportedly told Griffin that both they and the doctors believed he had intentionally abused his daughter and caused her injuries, either with blunt force or shaking her. Griffin protested, but the officers wouldn't let up, allegedly telling him that unless he confessed to harming her, the doctors wouldn't be able to treat her, that they would terminate his parental rights, and that she could die.

Griffin told the officers that a couple of weeks earlier, Naviah had fallen on the metal post of the swing and there was a bruise and suggested that this could have happened again, records show. But the officers would not relent. They wanted more, telling him his daughter will die "because he wasn't man enough to tell the truth," and that they suspected he lost his temper with the mom and took it out on the baby.

Griffin continued to deny hurting his child, but the intense questioning continued, according to reports, with police telling him "they were starting to believe he was a monster," that doctors will remove his daughter's brain should she die and determine she could have been saved had her dad been truthful about hurting her.

After accusing Griffin of not wanting to help his daughter, reports show, they told him he could leave — but threatened that he would likely not be able to see Navia again for at least 18 months, and that parental termination proceedings were imminent.

Desperate and afraid, Griffin caved.

"Given the coercive pressure being placed on (Griffin) ... and in a desperate attempt to satisfy the officers' relentless demands, (Griffin) stated that he sometimes taps Naviah on the back of the head, but he never does it hard and he plays with her that way," the lawsuit states, adding the dad also told the officers that he "sometimes throws her up and down, but also just to play with her and that he has never and would never hurt her."

At 1:10 p.m., on Oct. 1, seven hours after his interrogation, his daughter was pronounced dead following an unsuccessful craniotomy.

Five days later, Griffin was arrested and charged with felony murder and first-degree child abuse. At trial, he took the stand in his own defense and broke down crying when they showed him a photo of his deceased daughter. But he was unable to convince a jury that he was innocent.

Mom testifies at trial

During trial, jurors also heard from Patton, whose testimony largely focused on her relationship with Griffin, his parenting skills, and the events that transpired after she came home and found her daughter limp in Griffin's arms. She was never asked at trial whether she believed Griffin's explanation for how their daughter got hurt.

During her testimony, Patton said that she never had any concerns about Griffin appropriately caring for their daughter, that she never saw him lose his patience with her, that he was her primary caretaker while she attended a work program, and that the two did not have disagreements about how he cared for her.

She also pushed back on the prosecution's claims that she nodded her head yes when a medical examiner investigator asked her whether she believed Griffin had abused their daughter. She testified that she did not remember that.

"Did he love her?" the defense asked her on cross-examination.

"Yes," she answered.

Patton also testified that the baby once rolled off the sofa while in the dad's care. She took the baby to the hospital out of caution, she said, but there were no injuries. She also testified that he once broke a window in their home after arguing, but that the dispute was not about the baby.

According to Patton's testimony, here is what happened on the tragic day in question, when she returned home from a walk to a corner store and found her daughter limp in her father's arms:

"I grabbed her from him," she told the jury. "I thought she was gone."

She then ran out of the house, yelled for help. An apartment security guard resuscitated her daughter then grabbed a phone from the dad and called 911. An ambulance arrived and drove the mom and baby to the hospital. Dad was in a car behind them, with his mom.

At the hospital, the mom testified, Griffin would tell her the baby fell from the swing, and that he found her on the floor when he went upstairs to change her diaper. She said they waited for about two hours in the hospital waiting room, but got no answers about the condition of their child. At that point, she said, two police officers showed up and took her to the police station for questioning.

Michael Griffin, 33, of Flint, and his then-fiancée, Kalesha Journeay, 31, take a walk through a neighborhood on Flint's west side with his nephew Jacquees Griffin on Wednesday, May 10, 2023, after Michael Griffin was released from prison on bond. When he was 19, Griffin's daughter died after falling from a baby swing, and he was blamed for her death. He was convicted of murder and sentenced to life in prison, though he would profess his innocence for the next 14 years. He was exonerated after medical evidence showed a botched surgery caused her daughter's death. He is now suing over his wrongful conviction, alleging the police, hospital and forensic officials covered up their mistakes.

Patton did not testify about the interrogation, but said she went back to the hospital after questioning, and eventually learned that her daughter would need surgery. Five hours later, the doctors would give her the gut-wrenching news: her daughter didn't make it.

Meanwhile, the police would begin building a case against Griffin, using the "illegally elicited" statements he made during his interrogation against him, his lawsuit states. Those same statements would later be used to persuade a jury to convict him. The prosecution also used the statements to convince the court of appeals to uphold his conviction.

It wasn't until the Michigan Innocence Clinic and prominent plaintiff attorney Mike Morse intervened that he was exonerated.

'His court-appointed attorney was a disaster'

In securing Griffin's freedom, the Michigan Innocence Clinic and Morse argued that Griffin had an ineffective lawyer, noting the prosecution brought in seven doctors to testify against Griffin, while his public defender brought in none.

"There are lots of causes of wrongful convictions, but most of these cases have one thing in common: Bad or overworked lawyers, or public defenders. And this is one of the main reasons Mr. Griffin was wrongfully convicted," Morse said during a 2023 news conference when Griffin was released. "His court-appointed attorney was a disaster. He called no expert witnesses, despite the fact that the state called seven."

According to Griffin, it was Morse who ultimately secured his release by finding and bringing in doctors who explained to the court how the baby's death likely occurred. Morse, who had never before handled a criminal case and took this one pro bono, also argued that the scientific consensus around short fall and other head injuries had evolved since 2010, evidence that was not readily available when Griffin was convicted.

Using these arguments, Morse convinced Genesee County Circuit Court Judge Elizabeth Kelly to vacate Griffin's convictions in March 2023, release him on bond, and order a new trial.

But there was no retrial. After reevaluating the case, the Genesee County Prosecutor's Office opted not to retry it, dropped all charges and dismissed the case on Sept. 13, 2023.

When asked to explain this decision, Assistant Prosecutor John Pothbury declined comment, citing pending litigation.

On its website, the Mike Morse Law Firm commended the prosecutor's office, stating: "Throughout this entire process, the Genesee County Prosecutor's Office has been extremely professional and respectful to Mr. Griffin and his legal counsel. It is abundantly clear that Genesee County Prosecutor Mr. David Leyton and his staff care about doing their job the right way and only prosecuting cases when they have a good faith basis for believing the available evidence will support a conviction. "

A fresh start, a wife, and a new baby

Since his release, Griffin, who now runs a cleaning business, has embraced his freedom with new hope and purpose. He is a father again, and a husband. He married a woman he met years ago while he was in prison. The two now have a 1-year-old boy named Nash.

"He looks just like his sister," said Griffin, noting his son makes him smile again.

Michael Griffin, center, 33, of Flint, is hugged by family members as they come to visit him outside of his mother's house on Flint's west side on Wednesday, May 10, 2023, shortly after Griffin was released from prison on bond. When he was 19, Griffin's daughter died after falling from a baby swing, and he was blamed for her death. He was convicted of murder and sentenced to life in prison, though he would profess his innocence for the next 14 years. He was exonerated after medical evidence showed a botched surgery caused her daughter's death. He is now suing over his wrongful conviction, alleging the police, hospital and forensic officials covered up their mistakes.

And a lot of the anger is gone.

"I ended up letting it go," Griffin said. " I had to let go of all the emotions."

Following his exoneration, Griffin received $435,000 from the state for the years he spent in prison. The payout was supposed to be $696,000, or $50,000 for every year he was in prison. But he said he didn't get the entire amount because authorities said his daughter had been hurt before, and so they decided against giving him the full amount.

It didn't make sense to Griffin, who has long maintained he never harmed his daughter. But he said he's moving on from that, too, shifting his focus to his lawsuit, and working to hold all those accountable for the nightmare he was put through.

Losing a child was hard enough, he said. But then being blamed for her death was another matter.

"I wish nobody would ever go through this," said Griffin, noting he couldn't watch baby commercials for a long time. "I dealt with a lot of pain."

And now he wants the civil justice system to hold the police, doctors, medical examiners and others responsible for it.

"The whole time I was locked up I knew something crazy had happened," Griffin said. "I just kept saying, 'I didn't do it.' I believed the hospitals did something, the cops covered stuff up."

It took more than a year for Griffin to pursue a lawsuit. He said he "had an epiphany."

"I woke up my wife ... I said, 'If I'm sitting here, who is responsible for killing my daughter?' " Griffin recalled, noting he has never received an apology for his ordeal. "Nothing was ever said. Not an 'I'm sorry.' They locked me up for it and said 'I've done it.' "

"But now that I'm out," he added, he's intent on answering this question: "Who did it?"

Contact Tresa Baldas: [email protected]

This article originally appeared on Detroit Free Press: Flint dad Michael Griffin exonerated in daughter's death sues

Original Article on Source

Source: "AOL Breaking"

Read More


Source: Breaking

Published: December 01, 2025 at 11:54PM on Source: PRIME TIME

#ShowBiz#Sports#Celebrities#Lifestyle

Wrongfully convicted Michigan dad sues: 'They did me wrong'

Wrongfully convicted Michigan dad sues: 'They did me wrong' Tresa Baldas, Detroit Free Press December 1, 2025 at 2:...
New Photo - Publisher condemns 'violent' use of Franklin the Turtle after Pete Hegseth's boat strike post

Publisher condemns 'violent' use of Franklin the Turtle after Pete Hegseth's boat strike post Raquel Coronell UribeDecember 2, 2025 at 5:11 AM 0 The publisher of Franklin the Turtle released a statement Monday condemning the "violent" use of the children's book character after Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth posted an image with the title "Franklin Targets Narco Terrorists." "Franklin the Turtle is a beloved Canadian icon who has inspired generations of children and stands for kindness, empathy, and inclusivity," the publishing house Kids Can Press wrote in a statement on X.

- - Publisher condemns 'violent' use of Franklin the Turtle after Pete Hegseth's boat strike post

Raquel Coronell UribeDecember 2, 2025 at 5:11 AM

0

The publisher of Franklin the Turtle released a statement Monday condemning the "violent" use of the children's book character after Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth posted an image with the title "Franklin Targets Narco Terrorists."

"Franklin the Turtle is a beloved Canadian icon who has inspired generations of children and stands for kindness, empathy, and inclusivity," the publishing house Kids Can Press wrote in a statement on X.

"We strongly condemn any denigrating, violent, or unauthorized use of Franklin's name or image, which directly contradicts these values," the statement read.

Chief Defense Department spokesperson Sean Parnell responded to the publisher in a statement, saying: "We doubt Franklin the Turtle wants to be inclusive of drug cartels… or laud the kindness and empathy of narco-terrorists."

In the image Hegseth posted, Franklin stands on a helicopter and aims a machine gun at a boat. The post followed news reports that the Pentagon carried out a second strike on an alleged drug boat on Sept. 2, which the White House confirmed Monday.

Rep. Adam Smith of Washington, the top Democrat on the House Armed Services Committee, blasted Hegseth over the post.

"I've read books to my children, but not that one apparently. This is serious business. I mean, even if it's justified, even if it's right, seriously, you're killing people. And this is your response to tweet out some joke about a cartoon turtle," Smith told reporters.

"I mean, we need a secretary of defense who understands the seriousness and the importance of the job that he has. We don't have one," he added.

Smith put out a joint statement over the weekend with Armed Services Committee chair Mike Rogers, R-Ala., in which they said the panel would provide "rigorous oversight of the Defense Department's military operations in the Caribbean."

The top Republican and Democrat on the Senate Armed Services Committee — Roger Wicker, R-Miss., and Jack Reed, D-R.I. — said in a similar statement that they would conduct "vigorous oversight to determine the facts related to these circumstances."

The White House said Monday that the strike was ordered by Adm. Frank M. Bradley, who was overseeing the operation and at the time and was in charge of the Joint Special Operations Command. Some lawmakers and legal experts say the second attack, which reportedly killed the survivors of an initial strike, could constitute a war crime.

Original Article on Source

Source: "AOL Breaking"

Read More


Source: Breaking

Published: December 01, 2025 at 11:54PM on Source: PRIME TIME

#ShowBiz#Sports#Celebrities#Lifestyle

Publisher condemns 'violent' use of Franklin the Turtle after Pete Hegseth's boat strike post

Publisher condemns 'violent' use of Franklin the Turtle after Pete Hegseth's boat strike post Raquel Cor...
New Photo - Kristi Noem calls for new travel ban after National Guard shooting

Kristi Noem calls for new travel ban after National Guard shooting Zoë RichardsDecember 2, 2025 at 5:28 AM 0 Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem said Monday she is recommending a "full travel ban" from countries that are "flooding our nation with killers, leeches, and entitlement junkies." "I just met with the President. I am recommending a full travel ban on every damn country that's been flooding our nation with killers, leeches, and entitlement junkies," Noem wrote on X.

- - Kristi Noem calls for new travel ban after National Guard shooting

Zoë RichardsDecember 2, 2025 at 5:28 AM

0

Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem said Monday she is recommending a "full travel ban" from countries that are "flooding our nation with killers, leeches, and entitlement junkies."

"I just met with the President. I am recommending a full travel ban on every damn country that's been flooding our nation with killers, leeches, and entitlement junkies," Noem wrote on X.

"Our forefathers built this nation on blood, sweat, and the unyielding love of freedom—not for foreign invaders to slaughter our heroes, suck dry our hard-earned tax dollars, or snatch the benefits owed to AMERICANS.WE DON'T WANT THEM. NOT ONE," she added.

The Department of Homeland Security did not immediately respond to a request for comment about which countries Noem was referring to Monday night.

President Donald Trump shared her X post on Truth Social but did not comment on it.

A makeshift memorial outside the Farragut West Metro station in Washington on Monday. (Heather Diehl / Getty Images)

Trump has intensified his administration's crackdown on immigration in the wake of last week's shooting of two National Guard members on patrol in Washington, which left one guard member dead and the other in critical condition.

The Department of Homeland Security identified the suspect as an Afghan national who entered the United States legally in September 2021 after the U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan.

"We must now re-examine every single alien who has entered our country from Afghanistan under Biden, and we must take all necessary measures to ensure the removal of any alien from any country who does not belong here or add benefit to our country," Trump said in remarks hours after the shooting.

The following day, Trump said on social media that he planned to "permanently pause" all immigration from what he described as "third world countries."

The proposed travel ban is the latest in the Trump administration's efforts to restrict immigration to the United States.

Trump signed a proclamation in June banning nationals from 12 countries — including Afghanistan, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen — from entering the United States.

In October, the administration drastically reduced the annual refugee admissions cap to 7,500 — the lowest on record. The admissions numbers would "primarily be allocated" to white South Africans, according to a Federal Register memo.

Original Article on Source

Source: "AOL Breaking"

Read More


Source: Breaking

Published: December 01, 2025 at 11:54PM on Source: PRIME TIME

#ShowBiz#Sports#Celebrities#Lifestyle

Kristi Noem calls for new travel ban after National Guard shooting

Kristi Noem calls for new travel ban after National Guard shooting Zoë RichardsDecember 2, 2025 at 5:28 AM 0 Homeland ...
New Photo - Experts explain what the law says about killing survivors of a boat strike

Experts explain what the law says about killing survivors of a boat strike BEN FINLEY and KONSTANTIN TOROPIN December 1, 2025 at 10:25 PM 59 Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth arrives at a a pardoning ceremony for the national Thanksgiving turkey Gobble in the Rose Garden of the White House, Tuesday, Nov. 25, 2025, in Washington. (AP Photo/Julia Demaree Nikhinson) () WASHINGTON (AP) — The U.S. military would have committed a crime if it killed the survivors of an attack on an alleged drug boat, legal experts say. It doesn't matter whether the U.S.

- - Experts explain what the law says about killing survivors of a boat strike

BEN FINLEY and KONSTANTIN TOROPIN December 1, 2025 at 10:25 PM

59

Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth arrives at a a pardoning ceremony for the national Thanksgiving turkey Gobble in the Rose Garden of the White House, Tuesday, Nov. 25, 2025, in Washington. (AP Photo/Julia Demaree Nikhinson) ()

WASHINGTON (AP) — The U.S. military would have committed a crime if it killed the survivors of an attack on an alleged drug boat, legal experts say.

It doesn't matter whether the U.S. is in "armed conflict" with drug cartels as the Trump administration asserts. Such a fatal second strike would have violated peacetime laws and those governing armed conflict, the experts say.

"I can't imagine anyone, no matter what the circumstance, believing it is appropriate to kill people who are clinging to a boat in the water," said Michael Schmitt, a former Air Force lawyer and professor emeritus at the U.S. Naval War College. "That is clearly unlawful."

The White House confirmed Monday that a second strike was conducted in September against a vessel accused of trafficking drugs off the coast of Venezuela and insisted it was done "in self-defense" and in accordance with the laws of armed conflict.

A news report about that attack spawned a new level of scrutiny from lawmakers and added to a growing debate about whether service members can refuse to follow illegal orders, which some Democratic lawmakers recently encouraged.

Here's what to know about the strikes and laws of armed conflict:

What set off the debate

The Washington Post reported last week that Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth issued a spoken directive to "kill everybody" on a boat targeted on Sept. 2, the first vessel hit in what the Trump administration calls a counterdrug campaign that has grown to over 20 known strikes and more than 80 dead.

Two men survived that first attack, which killed nine others, and were clinging to the wreckage, the newspaper reported. The commander in charge, Adm. Frank Bradley, ordered a second strike to comply with Hegseth's instructions, killing the two men, the Post reported.

Hegseth called it "fake news" on social media, saying the boat strikes are "in compliance with the law of armed conflict — and approved by the best military and civilian lawyers, up and down the chain of command."

President Donald Trump said Sunday that the administration "will look into" it but added that "I wouldn't have wanted that — not a second strike." He noted that Hegseth told him "he did not order the death of those two men."

White House spokeswoman Karoline Leavitt told reporters Monday that Bradley had ordered the second strike and "was well within his authority to do so." She denied that Hegseth said to leave no survivors.

The administration has justified the attacks as a necessary escalation to stem the flow of drugs into the United States and asserted the U.S. is engaged in an "armed conflict" with drug cartels, similar to the war against al-Qaida following the Sept. 11 attacks.

What the law allows during armed conflict

A second strike killing survivors would have been illegal under any circumstance, armed conflict or not, Schmitt said.

He said the U.S. is not in a legitimate armed conflict with drug cartels, which would have to be committing high levels of violence against the country, not just trafficking drugs that kill Americans.

Even if it was, "it has been clear for well over a century that you may not declare what's called 'no quarter' — take no survivors, kill everyone," Schmitt said.

Whether an armed conflict is taking place likely would not be settled by an international body like the International Criminal Court, to which the U.S. is not a party, said Matthew Waxman, a Columbia University law professor who was a national security official in the George W. Bush administration.

The U.S., however, could face blowback from allies, which may decline to share information for military operations that are illegal under their own laws or international law, said Waxman, who served in the State and Defense departments and on the National Security Council under Bush.

America's armed conflict against al-Qaida received support from the U.N. Security Council, NATO and U.S. allies, he said.

The legal threat posed to US military personnel

If the U.S. is not in an armed conflict, that means it violated international human rights law, which governs how countries treat individuals, Schmitt said.

"You can only use lethal force in circumstances where there is an imminent threat," Schmitt said. "And that wasn't the case."

Brian Finucane, a senior adviser with the International Crisis Group and a former State Department lawyer, agreed that the U.S. is not in an armed conflict with drug cartels.

"The term for a premeditated killing outside of armed conflict is murder," Finucane said, adding that U.S. military personnel could be prosecuted in American courts.

"Murder on the high seas is a crime," he said. "Conspiracy to commit murder outside of the United States is a crime. And under the Uniform Code of Military Justice, Article 118 makes murder an offense."

The Pentagon's own manual on the laws of war describes a scenario similar to the Sept. 2 boat strike when discussing when service members should refuse to comply with unlawful orders.

"For example," the manual says, "orders to fire upon the shipwrecked would be clearly illegal."

What Congress has said about what comes next

Leaders of the Armed Services committees in both the House and Senate have opened investigations.

Republican Sen. Roger Wicker of Mississippi, chairman of the Senate's committee, and its top Democrat, Rhode Island Sen. Jack Reed, said the committee "will be conducting vigorous oversight to determine the facts related to these circumstances."

Concern about the second strike comes after a group of Democratic lawmakers — all veterans of the armed services and intelligence community — released a video calling on U.S. military members to defy "illegal orders."

Among them was Sen. Mark Kelly, an Arizona Democrat and former Navy fighter pilot who has questioned the use of the military to attack the alleged drug boats. The Pentagon says it's investigating Kelly over possible breaches of military law tied to the video.

Kelly said Monday that "if what seems to have happened, actually happened, I'm really concerned about our service members."

Senate Majority Leader John Thune has defended the boat strikes as stopping the flow of narcotics into the U.S. and said to wait for the outcome of the reviews.

"Obviously, if there was a direction to take a second shot and kill people, that's a violation of an ethical, moral or legal code. We need to get to the bottom of it," said Sen. Thom Tillis, a North Carolina Republican.

___

writers Stephen Groves, Lisa Mascaro and Joey Cappelletti contributed to this report.

Original Article on Source

Source: "AOL Breaking"

Read More


Source: Breaking

Published: December 01, 2025 at 11:54PM on Source: PRIME TIME

#ShowBiz#Sports#Celebrities#Lifestyle

Experts explain what the law says about killing survivors of a boat strike

Experts explain what the law says about killing survivors of a boat strike BEN FINLEY and KONSTANTIN TOROPIN December...
New Photo - Why future Office star was fired from Back to the Future after Michael J. Fox replaced Eric Stoltz

Fox details the domino effect that his replacing Stoltz weeks into production had on the '80s classic in his new memoir, &34;Future Boy.&34; Why future Office star was fired from Back to the Future after Michael J. Fox replaced Eric Stoltz Fox details the domino effect that his replacing Stoltz weeks into production had on the '80s classic in his new memoir, &34;Future Boy.&34; By Ryan Coleman :maxbytes(150000):stripicc()/RyanColemanauthorphoto0081ce8f0254478080f35972c433877b.

Fox details the domino effect that his replacing Stoltz weeks into production had on the '80s classic in his new memoir, "Future Boy."

Why future Office star was fired from Back to the Future after Michael J. Fox replaced Eric Stoltz

Fox details the domino effect that his replacing Stoltz weeks into production had on the '80s classic in his new memoir, "Future Boy."

By Ryan Coleman

Ryan Coleman author photo

Ryan Coleman

Ryan Coleman is a news writer for with previous work in MUBI Notebook, Slant, and the LA Review of Books.

EW's editorial guidelines

November 28, 2025 8:30 p.m. ET

Claudia Wells and Michael J. Fox. on the set of "Back to the Future"

Claudia Wells and Michael J. Fox in 'Back to the Future'. Credit:

Sunset Boulevard/Corbis via Getty

- *Back to the Future *star Michael J. Fox recounted in his new memoir about the making of the film, *Future Boy*, how his replacing Eric Stoltz six weeks into production led to another recasting.

- Melora Hardin, who'd already shot a number of scenes as protagonist Marty McFly's girlfriend Jennifer Parker, was ultimately recast by Claudia Wells after being deemed too tall for Fox.

- "Bob Zemeckis thought perhaps the audience could look past our height difference, but when he quickly surveyed the female members of the crew, they assured him that the tall pretty girl in high school rarely picks the cute short guy," Fox wrote.**

Hollywood can be brutal. Sometimes you lose a promising part in an upcoming film because you're deemed the wrong fit, but you can even lose your part because your *scene partner *is deemed the wrong fit.

Melora Hardin, the future star of *The Office*, found herself on the wrong end of such a casting decision after she'd already shot weeks of footage for the 1985 sci-fi comedy classic *Back to the Future*. Franchise star Michael J. Fox recounted the series of dominoes that fell, eventually toppling Hardin's chance at her first big break, in his new memoir of the making of the film, *Future Boy*.

"My goal as a child was self-­preservation. Bullies often ridiculed my height, an easy target. I suffered the indignity of short jokes and prejudice against my smallness," he wrote. Fox found that his diminutive stature "worked in my favor when I was a teenage actor playing a younger kid, but it turned against me as an adult, when I went up for romantic leads opposite taller actresses."

That sword proved to be double-edged, however, when Fox replaced Eric Stoltz as the lead in Robert Zemeckis and Steven Spielberg's time-traveling romp six weeks into production. Suddenly, it wasn't Fox who was too short, but Hardin, cast to play protagonist Marty McFly's girlfriend Jennifer Parker, who was too tall.

Elizabeth Shue back to the future 2

Elisabeth Shue in 'Back to the Future Part II'.

"I regret that this prejudice inadvertently affected another cast member in *Back to the Future *- Melora Hardin, the talented actress who had played Marty's girlfriend, Jennifer, opposite the perfectly tall Eric Stoltz," Fox explained. "Melora, several inches taller than me, was replaced in the movie after I took over as Marty. Initially, Bob Zemeckis thought perhaps the audience could look past our height difference, but when he quickly surveyed the female members of the crew, they assured him that the tall pretty girl in high school rarely picks the cute short guy."

Though he'd won one of the most coveted roles of the year among younger leading men, Fox, primarily known as the conservative wise guy Alex P. Keaton on the the NBC sitcom *Family Ties*, wasn't yet regarded as a true star. "No one asked for my opinion, but I would have risen to Melora's defense," he lamented.

Michael J. Fox opens up about being 'treated like s---' before 'Back to the Future' success

Editorial use only. No book cover usage. Mandatory Credit: Photo by Amblin Entertainment/Universal Pictures/Kobal/Shutterstock (5886092f) Lea Thompson, Michael J. Fox Back To The Future - 1985 Director: Robert Zemeckis Amblin Entertainment/Universal Pictures USA Scene Still Scifi Retour vers le futur

Great Scott, 'Back to the Future' is 40! See where the stars of the sci-fi classic are now

Michael J. Fox as Marty McFly and Christopher Lloyd as Doc Brown in Back to the Future'

Hardin was ultimately replaced by Claudia Wells, Zemeckis' first choice for the role, and Wells was replaced by Elisabeth Shue in *Back to the Future Part II *and *Back to the Future Part III*. So Hardin's breakout was delayed — but not for long. A role in the core cast of the short-lived *Dirty Dancing *TV series eventually led to memorable parts in series like *Cover Me*, *Monk*, and the series that would provide her signature role, *The Office*.

The actress has revisited her *Back to the Future *sliding doors moment in the past. Earlier this year on *The Joe Vulpis Podcast*, Hardin explained that "everyone knew" her casting in the film was "a big deal," as she had signed up for a two-picture deal, which guaranteed a spot in any subsequent sequel, depending on the film's success.

"I went and did some promotional pictures and stuff. And then [weeks] into filming, they fired Eric and brought in Michael J. Fox," she recalled. "When they did that, it was apparently the two female executives at the time that thought that it was emasculating for their lead character male to be in scenes with a woman that was taller than him."

***Get your daily dose of entertainment news, celebrity updates, and what to watch with our EW Dispatch newsletter.*****

Though Hardin has come to accept the executives' decision due to the pressures of the era ("The '80s was a really really hard time for women to be executives — I think they felt that they had to think in a masculine way because that was what was running Hollywood."), it wasn't easy to accept at the outset of her career. "At the time, at 17 years old, that was crushing for me, and very, very upsetting. Whatever! If I had done it, I'm sure it would have all gone in a different way. I wouldn't have done *The Office*."

The Office Jenna Fischer as Pam Beesly, Melora Hardin as Jan Levinson and Steve Carell as Michael Scott

Jenna Fischer, Melora Hardin, and Steve Carell on 'The Office'. Justin Lubin/NBCU Photo Bank

Wells too has reflected on the rounds of casting musical chairs that led to her finally stepping in as *Back to the Future*'s Jennifer.

"When I had to let it go, I had no qualms. And normally, if I didn't get a part that I wanted, I would have a lot of anxiety. But for some reason, I just felt a sense of peace," Wells told PEOPLE in 2015. The actress was initially sought for the role, but turned it down due to a prior commitment to the 1984 series *Off the Rack*.

By the time Fox replaced Stoltz, and producers went looking for a new Jennifer, however, the series had wrapped, leaving Wells free to reconsider. "I'm 5'3½", and Michael's 5'4", so I got my part back! How cool is that? It's absolutely fate."****

- Movie Reviews & Recommendations

- Sci-Fi & Fantasy Movies

Original Article on Source

Source: "EW Sci-Fi"

Read More


Source: Sci-Fi

Published: December 01, 2025 at 10:38PM on Source: PRIME TIME

#ShowBiz#Sports#Celebrities#Lifestyle

Why future Office star was fired from Back to the Future after Michael J. Fox replaced Eric Stoltz

Fox details the domino effect that his replacing Stoltz weeks into production had on the '80s classic in his new memoir, ...
New Photo - Wicked author Gregory Maguire to publish Galinda prequel book

The novel, titled &34;Galinda: A Charmed Childhood,&34; will chronicle the Good Witch's youth and serve as a &34;sister volume&34; to 2025's &34;Elphie: A Wicked Childhood.&34; Wicked author Gregory Maguire to publish Galinda prequel book The novel, titled &34;Galinda: A Charmed Childhood,&34; will chronicle the Good Witch's youth and serve as a &34;sister volume&34; to 2025's &34;Elphie: A Wicked Childhood.&34; By Wesley Stenzel :maxbytes(150000):stripicc()/WesleyStenzelauthorphoto32b61793a2784639af623f2ae091477e.jpg) Wesley Stenzel is a news writer at . He began writing for EW in 2022.

The novel, titled "Galinda: A Charmed Childhood," will chronicle the Good Witch's youth and serve as a "sister volume" to 2025's "Elphie: A Wicked Childhood."

Wicked author Gregory Maguire to publish Galinda prequel book

The novel, titled "Galinda: A Charmed Childhood," will chronicle the Good Witch's youth and serve as a "sister volume" to 2025's "Elphie: A Wicked Childhood."

By Wesley Stenzel

Wesley Stenzel

Wesley Stenzel is a news writer at **. He began writing for EW in 2022.

EW's editorial guidelines

November 29, 2025 1:15 p.m. ET

Leave a Comment

Ariana Grande in 'Wicked: For Good'

Ariana Grande in 'Wicked: For Good'. Credit:

Giles Keyte/Universal

- Author Gregory Maguire is writing a *Wicked* prequel novel about Galinda titled *Galinda: A Charmed Childhood*.

- The book will chronicle the Good Witch's youth and serve as a "sister volume" to 2025's *Elphie: A Wicked Childhood*.

- *Galinda: A Charmed Childhood* hits shelves Sept. 29, 2026.

Let us be glad. Let us be grateful.

Gregory Maguire is picking up his emerald pen for another book in his *Wicked Years* series.

The author's next *Wicked* novel will be a prequel titled *Galinda: A Charmed Childhood. *Note the extra A in the sorceress' name, as the story will take place before she shortens her name as a tribute to Dr. Dillamond.

As the title suggests, the book will follow the future Good Witch of the North through her youth, when she was "both pampered and ignored" by her parents, according to an official description from HarperCollins. It will also feature "district dance competitions" amid a backdrop of "growing resentments of local merchants who disapprove of her family's business strategies."

The synopsis also implies that Galinda's father will play a prominent role in the novel, as the Upland patriarch "deftly pivots around the snares and nets laid for him by his competitors."

Scarlett Spears in 'Wicked: For Good'

Scarlett Spears in 'Wicked: For Good'.

Universal Pictures

*Wicked: For Good *briefly depicted Galinda's childhood at the beginning of the film. Scarlett Spears (*General Hospital*) played a young version of Ariana Grande's beloved character, who in her youth desperately wanted to impress her friends with magical deeds despite a lack of natural skills in the spells department.

Maguire's first *Wizard of Oz* retelling, 1995's *Wicked: The Life and Times of the Wicked Witch of the West,* served as the inspiration for the *Wicked* stage musical and films.

The novelist has cranked out eight more installments in his ever-expanding *Wicked* universe since the musical hit Broadway in 2003, including mainline volumes like 2005's *Son of a Witch* (about Elphaba's son, Liir), 2008's *A Lion Among Men* (about the Cowardly Lion, Brrr), and 2011's *Out of Oz* (about Elphaba's granddaughter, Rain).

The surprising details behind creating Fiyero's blue horse(s) in 'Wicked: For Good'

Jonathan Bailey is Fiyero in WICKED FOR GOOD, directed by Jon M. Chu.

There was a word 'nobody says' in Oz — until Ariana Grande and Cynthia Erivo changed that 'For Good'

L to R: Cynthia Erivo is Elphaba and Ariana Grande is Glinda in WICKED FOR GOOD, directed by Jon M. Chu.

Maguire also released a short story collection titled *Tales Told in Oz* in 2012. Nine years later, he followed the main tetralogy with the *Another Day* sequel trilogy, composed of 2021's *The Brides of Maracoor*, 2022's *The Oracle of Maracoor*, and 2023's *The Witch of Maracoor*.

The author most recently expanded the *Wicked* world with another prequel, *Elphie: A Wicked Childhood*, which was released earlier this year. Like *Galinda: A Charmed Childhood*, *Elphie* pulled back the curtain on its titular witch's early years. *Galinda* is described as a "sister volume" to *Elphie* in HarperCollins' official description.

Jonathan Bailey as Fiyero and Ariana Grande as Glinda in 'Wicked: For Good'

Jonathan Bailey as Fiyero and Ariana Grande as Glinda in 'Wicked: For Good'.

Giles Keyte/Universal Pictures

***Get your daily dose of entertainment news, celebrity updates, and what to watch with our EW Dispatch newsletter.***

*Wicked: For Good* adapted the second half of the *Wicked *Broadway musical, bringing the story of Elphaba and Glinda to a close — for now. Though we don't know *how* the *Wicked *franchise will live on in film form, Universal's chief marketing officer, Michael Moses, told Vulture that the studio expects to bring more Ozian adventures to the big screen in the future.

"Because of *Wicked*'s success but also the fanship, we have almost a responsibility to figure out how we can continue in this universe," Moses said. "Have we figured it out yet? No. But there are things underway."

*Galinda: A Charmed Childhood* will hit shelves on Sept. 29, 2026.

- Sci-Fi & Fantasy Books

Original Article on Source

Source: "EW Sci-Fi"

Read More


Source: Sci-Fi

Published: December 01, 2025 at 10:38PM on Source: PRIME TIME

#ShowBiz#Sports#Celebrities#Lifestyle

Wicked author Gregory Maguire to publish Galinda prequel book

The novel, titled &34; Galinda : A Charmed Childhood,&34; will chronicle the Good Witch's youth and serve as a ...
New Photo - Zootopia 2 banishes Wicked: For Good to No. 2 spot with $156 million premiere at Thanksgiving box...

Made nearly a decade after the first film became a box office smash, Disney's animated sequel took on the allpowerful Oz and won. Zootopia 2 banishes Wicked: For Good to No. 2 spot with $156 million premiere at Thanksgiving box office Made nearly a decade after the first film became a box office smash, Disney's animated sequel took on the allpowerful Oz and won. By Ryan Coleman :maxbytes(150000):stripicc()/RyanColemanauthorphoto0081ce8f0254478080f35972c433877b.jpg) Ryan Coleman Ryan Coleman is a news writer for with previous work in MUBI Notebook, Slant, and the LA Review of Books.

Made nearly a decade after the first film became a box office smash, Disney's animated sequel took on the all-powerful Oz and won.

Zootopia 2 banishes Wicked: For Good to No. 2 spot with $156 million premiere at Thanksgiving box office

Made nearly a decade after the first film became a box office smash, Disney's animated sequel took on the all-powerful Oz and won.

By Ryan Coleman

Ryan Coleman author photo

Ryan Coleman

Ryan Coleman is a news writer for with previous work in MUBI Notebook, Slant, and the LA Review of Books.

EW's editorial guidelines

November 30, 2025 4:08 p.m. ET

Wicked: For Good and Zootopia 2

Ariana Grande and Jonathan Bailey in 'Wicked: For Good' and a still from 'Zootopia 2'. Credit:

Universal Studios; DISNEY

- *Zootopia 2 *topped the Thanksgiving weekend box office with an astounding $156 million domestic gross and an additional $400 million abroad.

- *Wicked: For Good*, last weekend's big winner, fell to the No. 2 spot on both charts, but still scared up $62.8 million domestically in its second weekend.

- It isn't likely any title on next weekend's release calendar has the power to topple both *Wicked *and *Zootopia*, but one contender is horror sequel *Five Nights at Freddy's 2*.

If *Wicked: For Good *was going to fall from box office grace after only one week at the top spot, at least Elphaba will be glad that it was because of a bunch of talking animals.

*Zootopia 2 *ran wild at the box office this Thanksgiving weekend, topping the domestic chart with $156 million (including Wednesday and Thursday previews) and the international chart with $400 million, making for a staggering cumulative premiere gross of $556 million globally, per Comscore.

That represented a decisive victory against its big sequel competitor, which would have run roughshod over any other new release this season. *Wicked: For Good *still fared quite well, conjuring up a bounteous $62.8 million in its second weekend domestically ($93 million when expanded to five days). That makes for a 57 percent drop from its $150 million premiere last weekend, but there's no doubt this film has legs that will confidently walk it all the way through the holidays.

Jeff Goldblum reveals the movie role that made him stop eating meat: 'It changed me'

Jeff Goldblum

See the new 'Zootopia 2' cast compared to the critters they voice

Nick Wilde (Jason Bateman), Gary De'Snake (Ke Huy Quan), and Judy Hopps (Ginnifer Goodwin) in 'Zootopia 2'

Featuring the voices of stars like Shakira, Quinta Brunson, and Macaulay Culkin, *Zootopia 2 *likely performed so exceedingly well due to the relative recent dearth of family films on the release calendar. Before this weekend, the only studio to release animated family fare into theaters this month was Universal, and it was a limited, 25th anniversary re-release of 2000's *Chicken Run*.

*Zootopia 2 *not only bested *Wicked*'s thrillifying conclusion at the box office this weekend, but it far surpassed the proceeds from its predecessor's premiere. *Zootopia *opened to $75 million in 2016. Even taking out the preview revenue, *Zootopia 2 *still earned $96.8 million at the Thanksgiving box office. With a global start in excess of half a million, the sequel is on track to blow past the first film's global end-run of $1 billion.

Elle Fanning in 'Predator: Badlands'

Elle Fanning in 'Predator: Badlands'.

Courtesy of 20th Century Studios

***Get your daily dose of entertainment news, celebrity updates, and what to watch with our EW Dispatch newsletter.*****

Elsewhere on the domestic and global charts, two holdovers proved their staying power. ****

*Now You See Me: Now You Don't* held fast to the No. 3 spot domestically with a week three take of $7 million, dropping only 22 percent from last week. That's after a reduction of 311 screens, too. In No. 4, *Predator Badlands *turned in a remarkably similar performance, dropping only 27 percent in week four with a $4.8 million take, but adding up to $85 million cumulatively, where the illusionist thriller threequel currently boasts $49.6 million overall at the domestic box office.

In the weekend's other new premieres, A24's afterlife rom-com *Eternity *scored a strong $5.2 million on its estimated $2 million budget, and Chloe Zhao's Oscar hopeful *Hamnet *earned $1.3 million in its one-weekend limited release.

Next week, *Zootopia 2 *and *Wicked: For Good *will likely block any would-be usurpers at the box office.

*Hamnet* opens wide, but given its scaling, subject matter, and targeting of awards voters, rather than general audiences, the chances of it leaping to No. 1 are virtually impossible. What may stand a chance, albeit a slim one, is Universal and Blumhouse's *Five Nights at Freddy's 2*.

The animatronic horror with a slight bend towards kids arrives in the long shadow cast by the first film's gangbusters debut. In 2023, *Five Nights at Freddy's *became a Halloween weekend hit with an $80 million premiere, resulting in a lifetime global gross of $291.5 million. Box office watchers will have to wait to find out if horror is the correct wedge to disrupt what looks from here to be *Wicked *and *Zootopia*'s assured dominance in the first weekend of December.

- Movie Reviews & Recommendations

- Movie Industry

Original Article on Source

Source: "EW Box"

Read More


Source: Box

Published: December 01, 2025 at 10:38PM on Source: PRIME TIME

#ShowBiz#Sports#Celebrities#Lifestyle

Zootopia 2 banishes Wicked: For Good to No. 2 spot with $156 million premiere at Thanksgiving box...

Made nearly a decade after the first film became a box office smash, Disney's animated sequel took on the allpowerful Oz a...

 

PRIME SKY © 2015 | Distributed By My Blogger Themes | Designed By Templateism.com