New Photo - Shai Gilgeous-Alexander trolls Dillon Brooks with 'Cancun on 3' jersey after Thunder sweep

Shai GilgeousAlexander trolls Dillon Brooks with &x27;Cancun on 3&x27; jersey after Thunder sweep Chris CwikWed, April 29, 2026 at 2:10 PM UTC 0 Phoenix Suns forward Dillon Brooks has a history of getting under his opponent’s skin. Throughout the team’s series against the Oklahoma City Thunder, Brooks tried his best to do that with Thunder star Shai GilgeousAlexander, but his attempts didn’t seem to land. After the Thunder swept the Rockets, GilgeousAlexander went so far as to compliment Brooks, saying the Rockets instigator was a “really good guy.

Shai Gilgeous-Alexander trolls Dillon Brooks with 'Cancun on 3' jersey after Thunder sweep

Chris CwikWed, April 29, 2026 at 2:10 PM UTC

0

Phoenix Suns forward Dillon Brooks has a history of getting under his opponent’s skin. Throughout the team’s series against the Oklahoma City Thunder, Brooks tried his best to do that with Thunder star Shai Gilgeous-Alexander, but his attempts didn’t seem to land.

After the Thunder swept the Rockets, Gilgeous-Alexander went so far as to compliment Brooks, saying the Rockets instigator was a “really good guy.” The two even shared an embrace on the court and some friendly words when the series was over.

But that friendliness didn’t last long. On Tuesday, Gilgeous-Alexander dropped a photo dump on Instagram which featured an image of Brooks wearing a “Cancun on 3” jersey.

Gilgeous-Alexander’s caption was also a nod to Brooks’ villain persona.

Advertisement

Brooks definitely took notice of the post, responding to it by saying, “Sounds like a ghost writer.” Brooks signed that comment with “The Villain.” Rapper Drake also commented, because of course he did.

Overall, this feud — if you can call it that — feels pretty tame, especially considering Brooks’ history.

Despite Brooks’ presence, Gilgeous-Alexander still managed to put up some excellent numbers in the Thunder’s four-game sweep of the Suns. Gilgeous-Alexander averaged 33.8 points in the series … and refused to engage in Brooks’ trolling tactics.

With the Thunder moving on, Gilgeous-Alexander can now focus on leading the team to back-to-back titles. After dominating in the regular season and the playoffs last year, the Thunder turned in a similarly strong performance this season, once again earning the top seed in the Western Conference.

While Brooks and the Suns turned in a good year, the team wound up as the No. 8 seed in the playoffs, meaning the road will only get tougher for Gilgeous-Alexander and the Thunder from here.

Original Article on Source

Source: "AOL Sports"

Read More


Source: Sports

Published: April 29, 2026 at 10:27AM on Source: PRIME TIME

#ShowBiz#Sports#Celebrities#Lifestyle

Shai Gilgeous-Alexander trolls Dillon Brooks with 'Cancun on 3' jersey after Thunder sweep

Shai GilgeousAlexander trolls Dillon Brooks with &x27;Cancun on 3&x27; jersey after Thunder sweep Chris CwikWed, April ...
New Photo - Pfizer's blood cancer drug meets main goal in late-stage trial

Pfizer&x27;s blood cancer drug meets main goal in latestage trial ReutersWed, April 29, 2026 at 11:42 AM UTC 0 FILE PHOTO: A logo of Pfizer at the company’s booth at the 8th China International Import Expo (CIIE) in Shanghai, China, November 6, 2025.REUTERS/Maxim Shemetov//File Photo April 29 (Reuters) Pfizer said on Wednesday its drug Elrexfio met the main goal in ‌a latestage trial that tested the bloodcancer treatment in patients who received at least one prior ​line of treatment. Here are further details on the trial: • Elrexfio has the U.S.

Pfizer's blood cancer drug meets main goal in late-stage trial

ReutersWed, April 29, 2026 at 11:42 AM UTC

0

FILE PHOTO: A logo of Pfizer at the company’s booth at the 8th China International Import Expo (CIIE) in Shanghai, China, November 6, 2025.REUTERS/Maxim Shemetov//File Photo

April 29 (Reuters) - Pfizer said on Wednesday its drug Elrexfio met the main goal in ‌a late-stage trial that tested the blood ‌cancer treatment in patients who received at least one prior ​line of treatment.

Here are further details on the trial:

• Elrexfio has the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's accelerated approval for treating patients with multiple myeloma ‌who have received at ⁠least four prior lines of treatment.

• Multiple myeloma is a cancer of the ⁠plasma cells, a type of white blood cell in the bone marrow that helps fight infection.

• Pfizer ​said ​the drug showed clinically ​meaningful improvement in progression ‌free survival, or living without the disease worsening, when compared to standard of care treatment.

Advertisement

• The trial remains ongoing to assess overall survival, a key secondary goal, as the data was not yet ‌available at the time of ​this interim analysis, the company ​said.

• The company ​said the trial data will be ‌discussed with global health authorities.

• ​Pfizer recorded Elrexfio ​sales of $304 million in 2025.

• Multiple myeloma accounts for roughly 1% to 2% of all ​cancers and ‌10% of blood cancers. Over 32,000 new cases ​are diagnosed annually in the US.

(Reporting by ​Christy Santhosh in Bengaluru)

Original Article on Source

Source: "AOL Breaking"

Read More


Source: Breaking

Published: April 29, 2026 at 07:54AM on Source: PRIME TIME

#ShowBiz#Sports#Celebrities#Lifestyle

Pfizer's blood cancer drug meets main goal in late-stage trial

Pfizer&x27;s blood cancer drug meets main goal in latestage trial ReutersWed, April 29, 2026 at 11:42 AM UTC 0 FILE PHOTO: A ...
New Photo - Why doesn’t Michael address Michael Jackson’s controversies?

The new biopic about the King of Pop bills itself as an “honest portrayal,” but avoids addressing the more controversial aspects of Jackson’s life and career. Why doesn’t Michael address Michael Jackson’s controversies? The new biopic about the King of Pop bills itself as an “honest portrayal,” but avoids addressing the more controversial aspects of Jackson’s life and career. April 25, 2026 8:00 a.m. ET Leave a Comment :maxbytes(150000):stripicc()/michaeljackson11a6a9d6f6d1445c78739fc461768a51b.

The new biopic about the King of Pop bills itself as an “honest portrayal,” but avoids addressing the more controversial aspects of Jackson’s life and career.

Why doesn’t Michael address Michael Jackson’s controversies?

The new biopic about the King of Pop bills itself as an “honest portrayal,” but avoids addressing the more controversial aspects of Jackson’s life and career.

April 25, 2026 8:00 a.m. ET

Leave a Comment

Michael Jackson appears at the Santa Barbara County Courthouse with defense attorney Thomas Mesereau, Jr. on March 24, 2005

Michael Jackson appears at the Santa Barbara County Courthouse with defense attorney Thomas Mesereau, Jr. on March 24, 2005. Credit:

Gwyneth Roberts/Polaris

Michael Jackson is back in the spotlight as a long-developing biopic about the late pop icon is finally hitting theaters. Directed by Antoine Fuqua and starring Jackson’s nephew, Jaafar Jackson, *Michael* explores the life and career of the King of Pop, who died in 2009.

Billed as an “honest portrayal of the brilliant and complicated” artist, the film depicts the childhood abuse Jackson endured at the hands of his father, Joe Jackson, as well as the 1984 Pepsi commercial shoot that left the pop star with burns on his scalp, precipitating an addiction to painkillers.

However, the biopic, which ends in 1988, notably avoids other controversial aspects of Jackson’s life — specifically, multiple allegations of child abuse that resulted in lawsuits and highly publicized court hearings.

This avoidance of Jackson's controversies has courted criticism, including from Dan Reed, the director of 2019's *Leaving Neverland*, a documentary about two men who allege that Jackson sexually abused them as children. "How can you tell an authentic story about Michael Jackson without ever mentioning the fact that he was seriously accused of being a child molester?" Reed asked in an April 2026 interview with *The Hollywood Reporter*.

According to numerous reports, an earlier version of the film *did *address the allegations from Jackson’s perspective, but the filmmakers were ultimately forced to cut those scenes and reshoot most of the third act.

Below, we unpack the allegations against Michael Jackson and how the film was originally meant to address them.**

What are the allegations against Michael Jackson?

Michael Jackson in a California courtroom in November 2002

Michael Jackson in a California courtroom in November 2002.

In 1993, Evan Chandler accused Jackson of molesting his 13-year-old son, Jordan Chandler. Jackson became friendly with Jordan when he rented a vehicle from the boy’s stepfather, and often invited the family to spend weekends at the pop star’s home on Neverland Ranch.

Jordan told a psychiatrist that Jackson sexually abused him, prompting the Los Angeles Police Department to open an investigation, during which they were unable to find any evidence of abuse.

By September, when Jordan’s family formally filed a lawsuit against Jackson, news of the allegations had already been widely publicized.

Jackson, who strongly denied the allegations, canceled the remaining dates on his *Dangerous* world tour, and ultimately settled with the Chandler family in January 1994 for a reported $25 million. The District Attorneys for Los Angeles and Santa Barbara Counties closed the investigation into Jackson in September 1994 when the Chandlers stopped cooperating with law enforcement.

Colman Domingo defends Michael Jackson biopic from claim it 'whitewashed' sexual abuse allegations

Colman Domingo; Jaafar Jackson

Michael Jackson was $500 million in debt when he died

Michael Jackson poses at a Pepsi Cola public relations event on the eve of the Radio City Music Hall Grammy Awards March 1, 1988 in New York City, New York

The investigation was reopened in 2003 when 13-year-old Gavin Arvizo claimed he'd been having sleepovers with Jackson in the documentary *Living With Michael Jackson*. Jackson was charged with multiple accounts of child abuse, resulting in a highly-publicized 2005 trial that spanned four months. He was ultimately acquitted on all counts.

Wade Robson, who testified for Jackson’s defense during that trial, filed his own lawsuit against the singer’s estate in 2013, four years after Jackson’s death.

Robson was five years old when he first met Jackson, who befriended and began spending time with Robson and his family. He claimed that Jackson molested him on two occasions, between the ages of seven and 14, but the statute of limitations expired and the lawsuit was dismissed in 2017.

Robson revisited the allegations along with another accuser, James Safechuck, in *Leaving Neverland*.

Jackson’s estate has continued to deny the allegations, which they’ve described as “absolutely false.”

Why doesn’t Michael address the controversies?

Michael Jackson exiting the Santa Barbara County Courthouse on April 12, 2005

Michael Jackson exiting the Santa Barbara County Courthouse on April 12, 2005.

AARON LAMBERT/AFP/Getty

*Variety* reported that *Michael* originally explored the LAPD’s 1993 investigation into Jackson. The first two acts of this early version are said to have traced the singer’s early life, with the third act largely devoted to the allegations and how they impacted Jackson and his career.

Late in the production, Jackson’s estate realized that the film was legally prohibited from including the 1993 allegations due to a clause in the settlement with Chandler’s family.

*Michael* producer Graham King confirmed to *WSJ* that the film's third act had to be rewritten and reshot. “I’ve never experienced that where you finish a film and then find out you didn’t have the legal rights to tell that story,” said King, who also produced the Oscar-winning Queen biopic *Bohemian Rhapsody*.

Per *WSJ*’s reporting, Jackson’s estate “paid tens of millions of dollars for the additional photography, which delayed the film’s release by a year.”

King worked with director Fuqua and screenwriter John Logan on a new third act, which focuses on Jackson “escaping the professional and psychological influence of his father.”

Spokespersons for Lionsgate, King, and the attorney representing the Jackson estate did not respond to **'s request for comment.

What have the cast and crew of Michael said about Jackson’s controversies?

Jaafar Jackson as Michael Jackson in 'Michael'

Jaafar Jackson as Michael Jackson in 'Michael'.

King began developing *Michael* in 2019, around the time that HBO released *Leaving Neverland*. The producer called the documentary “very one-sided” and said that his goal with *Michael* was “to let the audience decide how they feel about him.”

A recent *New Yorker* profile of Fuqua described the filmmaker as “skeptical of some of the accusers’ parents.” Fuqua, a veteran director whose credits include *Training Day* and *The Equalizer* films, said, “When I hear things about us — Black people in particular, especially in a certain position — there’s always pause.” He added that "sometimes people do some nasty things for some money.”

During an appearance on the *Today *show, stars Colman Domingo and Nia Long, who play Jackson’s parents Joe and Katherine, were asked how they would respond to critics claiming that *Michael* “whitewashed” the allegations. “The film takes place from the '60s to 1988, so it does not go into the first allegations in, what, 2005,” said Domingo, erroneously referring to the 2005 trial, which concerned Jackson’s second accuser.

“And there's a possibility of a part two that may deal with some other things that happened afterwards,” the actor added. “This is about the making of Michael, how he was raised and then how he was trying to find his voice as an artist and be a solo artist."

Jaafar Jackson, who portrays Michael in the film, has so far sidestepped questions about the allegations. At the *Michael* premiere, when *Extra* asked the younger Jackson what he thinks is the biggest “misconception” about his uncle, he replied, “That he wanted to be white.”

Screenwriter John Logan, meanwhile, told *The Hollywood Reporter*, “Michael is a complicated person, people have complicated opinions, and that’s fine. We chose to tell the uplifting story of his triumph in the movie, and that’s what we did.”

***Get your daily dose of entertainment news, celebrity updates, and what to watch with our EW Dispatch newsletter.***

- Celebrities & Creators

- Celebrity Feuds & Controversies

Original Article on Source

Source: "EW Celebrity"

Read More


Source: Celebrity

Published: April 26, 2026 at 07:00AM on Source: PRIME TIME

#ShowBiz#Sports#Celebrities#Lifestyle

Why doesn’t Michael address Michael Jackson’s controversies?

The new biopic about the King of Pop bills itself as an “honest portrayal,” but avoids addressing the more controversial aspects of Jack...
New Photo - Trump Justice Department indicts former FBI chief James Comey again

Trump Justice Department indicts former FBI chief James Comey again John BowdenTue, April 28, 2026 at 6:36 PM UTC 3 Donald Trump’s Department of Justice is renewing efforts to punish James Comey, CNN reported on Tuesday. The charges against Comey were unclear, but the matter stems from a photo he posted to social media of sea shells arranged on a North Carolina beach to read, "86 47," the first numbers indicating a slang term for getting rid of someone or something and the second presumed to a reference to Trump, who became the 47th president of the United States in his second term.

Trump Justice Department indicts former FBI chief James Comey again

John BowdenTue, April 28, 2026 at 6:36 PM UTC

3

Donald Trump’s Department of Justice is renewing efforts to punish James Comey, CNN reported on Tuesday.

The charges against Comey were unclear, but the matter stems from a photo he posted to social media of sea shells arranged on a North Carolina beach to read, "86 47," the first numbers indicating a slang term for getting rid of someone or something and the second presumed to a reference to Trump, who became the 47th president of the United States in his second term.

Comey was interviewed by the Secret Service in May after Trump officials claimed he was, through the posting, pushing for the assassination of Trump. Comey deleted the post shortly after it was made, writing: "I didn't realize some folks associate those numbers with violence" and "I oppose violence of any kind so I took the post down.”

Having emerged as a critic of the president’s in the time since leaving the FBI, Comey first earned Trump’s emnity in 2016 and 2017 when his agency began an investigation into the 2016 Trump campaign’s alleged ties to Russian officials. Trump has harbored anger against Comey for years, and since taking office in 2025 has directed the Department of Justice to begin a campaign of criminal prosecutions against Comey and others who have challenged him in similar ways, like New York Attorney General Letitia James.

Advertisement

Attorney General Pam Bondi headed up that effort at the agency before her firing earlier this month. Tuesday’s news is apparent confirmation that her replacement, acting Attorney General Todd Blanche, will continue in that vein.

Former FBI Director James Comey was indicted for a second time on Tuesday (Getty Images)

Last year, attorneys for the DoJ working out of the Eastern District of Virginia brought charges against Comey for allegedly lying to Congress pertaining to whether he authorized leaks to the press about the investigation into Donald Trump’s 2016 campaign for president and Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email server as secretary of State. He denied the charges, which never went to trial. Comey denied those accusations at the time, and declined to comment to CNN on Tuesday regarding the new charges.

A judge tossed the case against him instead last fall, ruling that former White House staffer Lindsey Halligan was illegally appointed to her role overseeing the Eastern District, making her actions as a prosecutor unlawful.

This is a breaking news report. More to follow.

Original Article on Source

Source: "AOL Breaking"

Read More


Source: Breaking

Published: April 28, 2026 at 02:54PM on Source: PRIME TIME

#ShowBiz#Sports#Celebrities#Lifestyle

Trump Justice Department indicts former FBI chief James Comey again

Trump Justice Department indicts former FBI chief James Comey again John BowdenTue, April 28, 2026 at 6:36 PM UTC 3 Donald Trum...
New Photo - Trump says "it's a dangerous profession" after shots fired at dinner

Trump says "it&x27;s a dangerous profession" after shots fired at dinner Kathryn WatsonSun, April 26, 2026 at 3:39 AM UTC 54 Trump takes questions on press dinner shooting, saying, "it's a dangerous profession" 00:30 President Trump told reporters Saturday night that he wanted the annual White House Correspondents' Dinner to go on after he was evacuated when shots rang out at the hotel where the event was taking place. The suspect, who is in custody and hospitalized, has been identified by three law enforcement sources as 31yearold Cole Allen of Torrance California.

Trump says "it's a dangerous profession" after shots fired at dinner

Kathryn WatsonSun, April 26, 2026 at 3:39 AM UTC

54

Trump takes questions on press dinner shooting, saying, "it's a dangerous profession" 00:30

President Trump told reporters Saturday night that he wanted the annual White House Correspondents' Dinner to go on after he was evacuated when shots rang out at the hotel where the event was taking place.

The suspect, who is in custody and hospitalized, has been identified by three law enforcement sources as 31-year-old Cole Allen of Torrance California. Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche said the investigation is "ongoing," and charges will be filed "shortly."

The president said one Secret Service agent was struck by a round but was protected by a bulletproof vest.

Mr. Trump said he was "very far away" when the shots were fired and said the suspect "hadn't come anywhere close to breach the doors of the room."

Asked if he was concerned about the threats to his life, Mr. Trump said, "It's a dangerous profession."

Mr. Trump released photos of the suspect and a clip of security video of the incident, "showing the violence of this thug that attacked the Constitution, and also showing how quickly Secret Service and law enforcement acted."

The evacuation occurred just after 8:30 p.m. ET after the sound of gunfire sent attendees scurrying and ducking under tables. Mr. Trump and first lady Melania Trump were whisked off the stage by Secret Service agents.

The suspect had a shotgun and handgun on him, according to two sources familiar with the investigation.

Mr. Trump said he "heard a noise" and thought it was a "tray going down."

Advertisement

"But it was a gun," the president said. "And some people really understood that pretty quickly, other people didn't. I was watching to see what was happening, probably should have gone down even faster. Melania was very cognisant, I think, of what happened. I think she knew immediately what happened."

"We were whisked away, along with other people, but we were really whisked away," he added.

President Trump is rushed out of the White House Correspondents' Association dinner after shots were fired outside the ballroom at the Washington Hilton on April 25, 2026. / Credit: Bo Erickson / REUTERS

One officer was shot but "saved by the fact that he was wearing a, obviously, a very good bulletproof vest. He was shot from very close distance with a very powerful gun," the president said. "The vest did the job."

The president said he spoke with the officer, and described him as being in good spirits.

"This was an event dedicated to freedom of speech that was supposed to bring together members of both parties with members of the press," the president said. "And in a certain way it did. Because the fact that they just unified, I saw a room that was just totally unified. It was, in one way, very beautiful, a very beautiful thing to see."

Mr. Trump said the event would be rescheduled within the next 30 days. He added that he "fought like hell" to keep the event going, but law enforcement insisted otherwise.

White House Correspondents Association president and CBS News correspondent Weijia Jiang asked Mr. Trump what he was feeling when it occurred, particularly after he was shot in Butler, Pennsylvania. Mr. Trump said "it's always shocking when something like this happens. Happened to me, a little bit. And that never changes."

Mr. Trump also addressed political violence, saying "no country is immune."

"It comes with the territory," he said.

"We have to, we have to resolve our differences," Mr. Trump said. "I will say you had Republicans, Democrats, independents, conservatives, liberals and progressives. Those words are interchangeable, perhaps, but maybe they're not. But yet everybody in that room, big crowd, record-setting crowd, there was a record-setting group of people, and there was a tremendous amount of love and coming together. I watched, I watched, and I was very, very impressed by that."

Original Article on Source

Source: "AOL Breaking"

Read More


Source: Breaking

Published: April 25, 2026 at 11:54PM on Source: PRIME TIME

#ShowBiz#Sports#Celebrities#Lifestyle

Trump says "it's a dangerous profession" after shots fired at dinner

Trump says "it&x27;s a dangerous profession" after shots fired at dinner Kathryn WatsonSun, April 26, 2026 at 3:39 ...
New Photo - Starmer escapes sleaze inquiry after ex-top aide takes blame for Mandelson vetting scandal

Starmer escapes sleaze inquiry after extop aide takes blame for Mandelson vetting scandal David Maddox and Kate DevlinTue, April 28, 2026 at 6:39 PM UTC 0 Sir Keir Starmer is in the clear over the Peter Mandelson vetting scandal after his former political aide took the blame for his appointment on another turbulent day in parliament.

Starmer escapes sleaze inquiry after ex-top aide takes blame for Mandelson vetting scandal

David Maddox and Kate DevlinTue, April 28, 2026 at 6:39 PM UTC

0

Sir Keir Starmer is in the clear over the Peter Mandelson vetting scandal after his former political aide took the blame for his appointment on another turbulent day in parliament.

With a win of 335 to 223 Labour used its majority to block a “sleaze” inquiry by the powerful Commons Privileges Committee into whether the prime minister misled parliament, Sir Keir appeared to be over the worst of a scandal, which has rocked the foundations of his premiership.

He received a huge boost in the morning when his former chief of staff, Morgan McSweeney, took the fall for the appointment of Lord Mandelson as ambassador to the US.

Apologising to the victims of the convicted paedophile Jeffrey Epstein, a close friend of Lord Mandelson whose relationship with the disgraced peer ultimately led to his sacking, Mr McSweeney told the Foreign Affairs Select Committee that “the appointment of Mandelson as ambassador was a serious error of judgement”.

“I advised the prime minister in support of that appointment, and I was wrong to do so,” he added.

But despite the evidence from Mr McSweeney and former Foreign Office permanent secretary Sir Philip Barton to the committee, questions remain over Sir Keir’s judgement.

Several Labour MPs made it clear they would not support him in the Privileges Committee vote and questioned why he had not referred himself for investigation.

Clapham and Brixton MP Bell Ribeiro-Addy said: “If I was, I would be voting for the motion. Transparency is a cornerstone of our democracy. The best thing for the PM to do would be to simply refer himself on this matter and save us all the drama.”

South Shields MP Emma Lewell said she would defy Sir Keir and vote for him to face a grilling by the committee. She said: “The way today’s vote has been handled by the government smacks once again of being out of touch and disconnected from the public mood.”

Sir Keir Starmer has insisted he would not have gone ahead with having Lord Peter Mandelson as his top diplomat to Washington had he known about the vetting (PA Wire)

Opening the debate, Tory leader Kemi Badenoch asked Labour MPs: “Do they still believe honesty and accountability matter when it is one of their own?”

The leader of the SNP in Westminster, Stephen Flynn, warned that Labour MPs “cannot outrun Peter Mandelson, they cannot outrun their own prime minister and his record”.

And Lib Dem leader Sir Ed Davey warned: “The prime minister called this motion a stunt, that is not why I put my name to it. But it’s funny, though, because ‘stunt’ is exactly the same word Boris Johnson used about the motion the prime minister and I tabled four years ago, referring Boris Johnson to the privileges committee.”

While Labour ran short of MPs willing to speak in the debate, several were willing to speak up for the PM.

Advertisement

Andrew Lewin, Labour MP for Welwyn Hatfield, says “one more committee” is not the answer, as he believes the prime minister and government were not hiding but “putting everything in the sunlight”.

But Sir Keir was aided earlier when Mr McSweeney pinned the blame for the row firmly on Lord Mandelson, who he said had not been honest and would not have “come close” to the job if the allegations in the Epstein files had been known at the time.

Lord Mandelson is facing a police inquiry over claims he leaked sensitive government documents to the paedophile financier Jeffrey Epstein.

Mr McSweeney, who began his evidence session with MPs investigating the scandal by remembering Epstein’s victims, said it was “like a knife through my soul” when he realised Mandelson’s full links to the convicted sex offender, after he became ambassador.

Mr McSweeney, who denied Lord Mandelson was his hero despite his close relationship with the former peer, also said that the Labour grandee was the first to suggest his own name for the Washington job.

He revealed that the former ambassador was inside No 10 on the day of the last Cabinet reshuffle but denied Lord Mandelson’s “ideas” affected the outcome.

Former No 10 chief of staff Morgan McSweeney appearing before the Foreign Affairs Committee (PA Wire)

And he was forced to deny there was a “jobs for the boys” culture in No 10 after he admitted discussions about a separate ambassador role for Sir Keir’s then spin doctor Matthew Doyle, saying the PM wanted him “to be able to land on his feet” after losing his job.

He also denied telling the boss of the Foreign Office boss to “just f***ing approve” Lord Mandelson for the role.

Mr McSweeney denied wanting the ex-Labour minister to be granted security clearance “at all costs”. Before the appointment, he said, he believed Lord Mandelson had been the right man to deal with Donald Trump – in part because of the need to secure a post-Brexit UK-US trade deal.

“What I did do was make a recommendation based on my judgement that Mandelson’s experience, relationships and political skills could serve the national interest in Washington at an important moment. That judgement was a mistake,” he told MPs.

“What I did not do was oversee national security vetting, ask officials to ignore procedures, request that steps should be skipped, or communicate explicitly or implicitly that checks should be cleared at all costs.”

But he insisted he was not solely responsible for advising Sir Keir to pick Lord Mandelson and hit out at suggestions by some cabinet ministers that they had warned against the appointment.

“I know that a lot of people now say they told the prime minister they were against it at the time,” he said. “Everything I know about how the prime minister works is he will consult widely, he will take a lot of views on, and if everybody else was opposed to this appointment but me, he would not have made an appointment such as that.”

He also confirmed that the other person on the shortlist was George Osborne, the former Tory chancellor of the exchequer, hated by many within Labour as the architect of austerity.

Original Article on Source

Source: "AOL Breaking"

Read More


Source: Breaking

Published: April 28, 2026 at 02:54PM on Source: PRIME TIME

#ShowBiz#Sports#Celebrities#Lifestyle

Starmer escapes sleaze inquiry after ex-top aide takes blame for Mandelson vetting scandal

Starmer escapes sleaze inquiry after extop aide takes blame for Mandelson vetting scandal David Maddox and Kate DevlinTue, Ap...
New Photo - Trump administration indicts former NIH official over COVID records

Trump administration indicts former NIH official over COVID records ReutersTue, April 28, 2026 at 6:35 PM UTC 0 FILE PHOTO: People walk past a COVID19 testing sign during the coronavirus disease (COVID19) pandemic in the Manhattan borough of New York City, New York, U.S., January 20, 2022. REUTERS/Carlo Allegri/File Photo WASHINGTON, April 28 (Reuters) The Trump administration has indicted a former National Institutes of Health official over allegations of evading federal records requests related to COVID19 pandemic ‌research grants and the use of personal email for government business.

Trump administration indicts former NIH official over COVID records

ReutersTue, April 28, 2026 at 6:35 PM UTC

0

FILE PHOTO: People walk past a COVID-19 testing sign during the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic in the Manhattan borough of New York City, New York, U.S., January 20, 2022. REUTERS/Carlo Allegri/File Photo

WASHINGTON, April 28 (Reuters) - The Trump administration has indicted a former National Institutes of Health official over allegations of evading federal records requests related to COVID-19 pandemic ‌research grants and the use of personal email for government business.

A grand jury in ‌Maryland charged David Morens, a senior official at the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) during the pandemic, with ​conspiring to evade records requests received by the agency between April 2020 and December 2022.

The indictment, filed under seal April 16 and unsealed on Monday, also names two alleged co-conspirators - a New York-based nonprofit organization focused on infectious diseases and a physician at an academic institution that received NIH grants.

“As ‌alleged in the indictment, Dr. Morens ⁠and his co-conspirators deliberately concealed information and falsified records in an effort to suppress alternative theories regarding the origins of COVID-19," Acting U.S. Attorney General ⁠Todd Blanche wrote in a statement announcing the charges on Tuesday.

Representatives for Morens could not be immediately reached for comment on the allegations.

He faces five charges, including conspiracy; records destruction, alteration or falsification in ​federal investigations ​and concealment, removal or mutilation of records.

Advertisement

The indictment is ​the latest action by Republican U.S. ‌President Donald Trump's administration related to the origins of the coronavirus that shuttered much of the world starting in late 2019 during his first term in the White House.

The World Health Organization and most scientists say a spillover from nature was the most likely cause for the pandemic. Investigations have been hampered by a lack of data from China, but U.S. intelligence services said last ‌year that a lab leak was probably the cause.

A ​Republican-led U.S. Senate panel is also probing the origins ​of the pandemic, including a records request ​to leading medical journal the Lancet.

Some Republicans have accused former NIAID Director ‌Dr. Anthony Fauci of suppressing the theory that ​COVID-19 originated from a ​lab leak in China. Fauci has strongly denied suppressing that theory, telling a U.S. House of Representatives subcommittee in 2024 he never influenced research on the origins of the ​virus.

Morens, an adviser to Fauci, was ‌also called to testify last year by the Republican-led subcommittee on COVID, which ​subpoenaed tens of thousands of his emails including those between him and the NIAID ​head.

(Reporting by Susan Heavey; editing by David Gaffen)

Original Article on Source

Source: "AOL Breaking"

Read More


Source: Breaking

Published: April 28, 2026 at 02:54PM on Source: PRIME TIME

#ShowBiz#Sports#Celebrities#Lifestyle

Trump administration indicts former NIH official over COVID records

Trump administration indicts former NIH official over COVID records ReutersTue, April 28, 2026 at 6:35 PM UTC 0 FILE PHOTO: Peop...

 

PRIME SKY © 2015 | Distributed By My Blogger Themes | Designed By Templateism.com